These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184767)

  • 1. Court-authorised caesareans: new guidance.
    Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caesarean sections by court order.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1996 Sep; 348(9030):770. PubMed ID: 8813981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend?
    Michalowski S
    Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enforced caesareans.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Apr; (127):21-4. PubMed ID: 16127837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caesareans under duress.
    Health Care Anal; 1997 Jun; 5(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 10167719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forcible caesarean: a new direction in British maternity care? Thoughts on the case of Mrs S.
    Crafter H
    Nurs Ethics; 1994 Mar; 1(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 7828056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-authorised caesarean section.
    Edozien L
    BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1096. PubMed ID: 25047485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caesarean sections, phobias and foetal rights.
    Herring J
    Camb Law J; 1997 Nov; 36(3):509-11. PubMed ID: 11657622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court orders caesarean section.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Oct; No. 82():3-4. PubMed ID: 11651514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caesareans without consent authorised.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):705. PubMed ID: 8819431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
    Rowan C
    Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re A.C.
    Bourke LH
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical treatment: the mother's rights.
    Bridgeman J
    Family Law; 1993 Sep; 23():534-5. PubMed ID: 11657220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.