These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10184819)
1. Unenforceable today, enforceable tomorrow--Illinois Supreme Court reverses Berlin decision. Richard B. Berlin, Jr., M.D. v. Sara Bush Lincoln Health Center. Becker S; Traugott C Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Nov; ():9-12. PubMed ID: 10184819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new look for the corporate practice of medicine doctrine: Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center. Clousson JP; Butz JT J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(3):174-85, 192. PubMed ID: 10184598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reclassifying physicians as employees for Federal tax purposes. Borders TC; Halpern M Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Feb; 48(2):38, 40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10145952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corporate practice of medicine: last stand or final downfall? Parker J J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(3):160-73. PubMed ID: 10160033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court ruling draws new attention to practice doctrine. Hudson T Hospitals; 1991 Sep; 65(18):60, 62. PubMed ID: 1885203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical restrictive covenants in Illinois: at the crossroads of Carter-Shields and Prairie Eye Center. Gimbel S; Zaremski MJ Ann Health Law; 2003; 12(1):1-22, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12705203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taxes. Contract hits. Frank BH Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(6):19-21. PubMed ID: 10175034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Corporate practice of medicine through licensed employees. Mitchell MW J Ark Med Soc; 1985 Jul; 82(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 3161866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The corporate practice of medicine doctrine revisited. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 10111823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal status of the hospital medical staff. Horty JF; Mulholland DM Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Apr; (2):5-20. PubMed ID: 10295001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Judge: docs' lawsuit can proceed. Case involving UCLA Medical Center will test law on corporate practice of medicine. Rauber C Mod Healthc; 1999 Aug; 29(32):30. PubMed ID: 10558242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal aspects of hospital-based groups. Landau BD; Taubin MJ; Roth AB Top Health Care Financ; 1982; 9(2):15-28. PubMed ID: 7179276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physicians. Going to court for clout. Nordhaus-Bike AM Hosp Health Netw; 1997 Jun; 71(11):41-2. PubMed ID: 9189024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Virginia court maintains distinction between physician and his wholly owned professional corporation. Schwartz v. Brownlee. Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Mar; 15(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 10179090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital/physician contracting and the illegality defense. Peregrine MW; Waller AA; O'Dwyer JS J Health Hosp Law; 1994 May; 27(5):129-40, 160. PubMed ID: 10137987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicians' access to the hospital: an overview. Kessenick LW; Peer JE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Jun; 3(4):5-37. PubMed ID: 10295107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]