201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10185365)
1. FAHS refers Stark II reactions to HCFA.
Gogal L
Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):4. PubMed ID: 10185365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules.
Portman RM; Lisa GC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed Stark II regulations unveiled. HCFA interpretation of self-referral rules recognize circumstances of dialysis providers.
Riley JB; Pristave RJ
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Jun; 12(6):13-5. PubMed ID: 9697471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships.
Avery PA; Wachler AB
Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New final Stark II regulations.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):14. PubMed ID: 11373811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Specialty hospitals: Congress should act to level the playing field.
Grassley C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):13. PubMed ID: 16075770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The stark reality for physician-owned specialty hospitals.
Oostdyk S; McCormick D
Health Care Law Mon; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):2-11. PubMed ID: 22117495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II.
Katayama AC
WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciphering Stark II may test your patience.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Aug; 23(8):148-9. PubMed ID: 10181313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations.
Siegel S
Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices.
Larios D; Meyer A
Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stark II Final Rule (Phase I): some answers, more questions.
Shay AW; Murphy SL
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 15988954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCFA makes concession on 'Stark I' exemptions.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1995 Oct; 25(44):48. PubMed ID: 10152138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are cardiac-catheterization services Stark designated health services?
Becker S; Kannensohn K
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Aug; ():6-8. PubMed ID: 10173889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase I of the Stark II final rule.
Wachler AB; Avery PA
Mich Health Hosp; 2001; 37(4):52-3. PubMed ID: 11467128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HCFA implementation of Stark II law examines motive in payment review.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Aug; 7(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 10182585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stark II: the quagmire thickens.
Ivers D
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jul; 95(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9676062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HCFA needs to shine some light through Stark II's murkiness on 'gifts'.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 7(11):56-7. PubMed ID: 10187130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Remuneration arrangements important part of Stark II regulations.
Caesar N
Manag Care; 1998 Jul; 7(7):65-6. PubMed ID: 10181941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can it be--Pete Stark, the doctor's pal?. Interview by Michael Pretzer.
Stark P
Med Econ; 1998 Dec; 75(24):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 10338829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
