These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10185635)

  • 1. Medical errors: root cause analysis.
    Spath P
    OR Manager; 1998 Sep; 14(9):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 10185635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
    OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Showing improvement is a must for 1999 survey.
    OR Manager; 1998 Dec; 14(12):1, 10. PubMed ID: 10187725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conduct a cost-effective RCA (root-cause analysis) by brainstorming.
    Hirsch KA; Wallace DT
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Jul; 24(7):105-6, 111-2. PubMed ID: 10538284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sentinel events and root cause analyses.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 91(10):42. PubMed ID: 18551980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisions to the sentinel event policy.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Oct; 25(10):4-6, 11. PubMed ID: 16519339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized incident reporting: an example of healthcare IT for the 21st century.
    Sorenson L
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2001; 21(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 11411061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistics provide insight into causes of sentinel events.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Aug; 22(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 12221920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State systems for 'serious reportable events' will require reporting, analysis.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2001 Dec; 26(12):161-4. PubMed ID: 11759480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor communication is common cause of errors.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2002 Aug; 1(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12224120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preventing surgical fires.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Sep; 23(9):10-1. PubMed ID: 14533459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentinel events, root cause analysis and the trustee.
    Croteau RJ
    Trustee; 2003 Mar; 56(3):33-4. PubMed ID: 12685173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A positive sentinel event? A says it's possible.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2002 Aug; 1(2):16-8. PubMed ID: 12224119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sentinel event policy: a response by the Joint Commission.
    Bressler H
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(3):519-39. PubMed ID: 11184358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who should mark the surgical site?
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 14740470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New Joint Commission report warns: sentinel events most likely in the ED.
    ED Manag; 2002 Dec; 14(12):133-5. PubMed ID: 12491756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marking the site for spinal surgery.
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 14740472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentinel event trends in wrong-site surgery.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 11009953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditing and improving the sponge count process.
    Farrell V; Higbie V; Cleveland S
    OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12661500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handoffs: lessons from other industries.
    Patterson E
    OR Manager; 2005 Aug; 21(8):11-2. PubMed ID: 16146178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.