BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

28 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186236)

  • 1. How a US Federal Privacy Law Covering Digital Health Services Can Put Autonomy Back into the Hands of the Patient.
    Jin JE
    Am J Bioeth; 2023 Nov; 23(11):45-47. PubMed ID: 37879031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Privacy regulations revert to HHS while Congress works on other issues.
    Levin-Epstein M
    Manag Care; 1999 Oct; 8(10):27-8. PubMed ID: 10661947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical records and your privacy: developing federal legislation to protect patient privacy rights.
    Hussong SJ
    Am J Law Med; 2000; 26(4):453-74. PubMed ID: 11209650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feds: price of privacy may be too high. FBI, Justice Department say patient confidentiality bills would threaten fraud crackdown.
    Hallam K
    Mod Healthc; 1999 May; 29(18):12-3. PubMed ID: 10387837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health and the right to privacy.
    Starr P
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):193-201. PubMed ID: 10476328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical records privacy gets new push.
    Szabo J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Feb; 32(2):18. PubMed ID: 10787886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The medical records maze: a construct of federal inaction and state inconsistency.
    Knepper K
    J Health Hosp Law; 1998 Jun; 31(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 10186236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Privacy and autonomy in the physician-patient relationship. Independent contracting under Medicare and implications for expansion into managed care.
    Coleman PG; Shellow RA
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):509-43. PubMed ID: 8568417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer surveillance and information: balancing public health with privacy and confidentiality concerns (United States).
    Deapen D
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Jun; 17(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 16633909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In camera inspections of privileged records in sexual assault trials: balancing defendants' rights and state interests under Massachusetts's Bishop Test.
    Crowley EM
    Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(1):131-64. PubMed ID: 7573081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Privacy and confidentiality of health information.
    Lowe M; Havens DM
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1998; 12(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 9515500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicolegal developments and the dermatologist.
    Torres A; Proper S
    Adv Dermatol; 1997; 12():299-322; discussion 323. PubMed ID: 8973745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.