These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186240)
21. HCFA needs to shine some light through Stark II's murkiness on 'gifts'. Caesar N Manag Care; 1998 Nov; 7(11):56-7. PubMed ID: 10187130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. How the new Stark II regulations affect group practices. Larios D; Meyer A Tenn Med; 1998 Apr; 91(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 9564245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Stark self-referral rules burdened with complexities. Barratt K; Katayama A Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 8571621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New Stark II rules on referrals will further restrict medical practices. Caesar N Manag Care; 1997 May; 6(5):96-8. PubMed ID: 10168642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA issues. Stark II proposed rules. Portman RM; Lisa GC Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jun; 83(6):20-23. PubMed ID: 10180259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark II proposed regulations. Davis JP Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Apr; 52(4):65-9. PubMed ID: 10178067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Stark laws: conquering physician conflicts of interest? Klein JE Georgetown Law J; 1998 Nov; 87(2):499-529. PubMed ID: 10346702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships. Avery PA; Wachler AB Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility. Chase L Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CMS issues final Phase III Regulations--significant impact on physician-hospital and physician-driven relationships. Becker S; Lundeen R; Heinze G Health Care Law Mon; 2007 Dec; 2007(12):2-19. PubMed ID: 18277700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Stark: the key exceptions for group practices. Cassidy MA Health Care Law Mon; 2001 Sep; ():4-10. PubMed ID: 11594198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act. Becker S; Nino K Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of the new Stark Phase II regulations. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Jun; ():3-15. PubMed ID: 15250190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. CMS issues phase II Stark regulations. Rule applies to home health services interim final rule published in March 26, 2004 Federal Register. Home Healthc Nurse; 2004 May; 22(5):301. PubMed ID: 15179942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Riley J; Pristave R Nephrol News Issues; 2008 Jan; 22(1):42-3, 56. PubMed ID: 18271439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Not knowing the Stark lab rules can cost you big. Pretzer M Med Econ; 1996 Jan; 73(1):91-2, 94, 99 passim. PubMed ID: 10153938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Stark II proposed regulations. More restrictions, more confusion. Commins K Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(3):36. PubMed ID: 10179372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The final Stark II rule: implications for hospital-physician arrangements. Melvin DH; Polacheck JF Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):62-6. PubMed ID: 11588869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]