These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186264)

  • 1. Tales from the dark side of medicine.
    Forster J
    Med Econ; 1998 Oct; 75(20):116, 119-20. PubMed ID: 10186264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Third Reich in the pages of the American Journal of Nursing, 1932-1950.
    Lagerwey MD
    Nurs Hist Rev; 2006; 14():59-87. PubMed ID: 16411471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter: Century-old complaint re malpractice.
    McCallum JE
    N Engl J Med; 1976 Jan; 294(1):59. PubMed ID: 1105183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Watch out for the wolves: predatory publishing.
    Carroll VS
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2015 Feb; 47(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25565591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BJN 100 years ago. Nurses in the dock.
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Mar 26-Apr 8; 18(6):380. PubMed ID: 19329905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plagiarism charge casts shadow on peer review.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6230):173. PubMed ID: 2535651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical malpractice in Arkansas in the twentieth century.
    Dougan MB
    Res Pap Hist Med Assoc; 1999; (2):139-60. PubMed ID: 12430561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping ahead of the media.
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1990 May; 142(9):919. PubMed ID: 2328458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Session on malpractice.
    Smith GR
    West Med Med J West; 1967; 8(7):144-6. PubMed ID: 4861570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical malpractice and peer review in medieval England.
    Cosman MP
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3 Pt 1):293-7. PubMed ID: 1101507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where are monthly research journals?
    Morse JM
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1995; 27(1):6. PubMed ID: 7721320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review criteria for research manuscripts.
    Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS;
    Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asia backs E-Biomed 'with peer review'.
    Saegusa A
    Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6744):491. PubMed ID: 10448840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exclusionary editorial policy of peer-reviewed publications and the accuracy of news tabloids.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1111-2. PubMed ID: 3741218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Ingelfinger rule.
    Grouse LD
    JAMA; 1981 Jan 23-30; 245(4):375-6. PubMed ID: 7452865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Ingelfinger Rule revisited.
    Angell M; Kassirer JP
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Nov; 325(19):1371-3. PubMed ID: 1669838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coping with peer rejection.
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):645. PubMed ID: 14562060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.