106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186680)
1. Implementation issues and costs associated with a proven strategy for increasing breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women.
Lantz PM; Stencil D; Lippert MT; Jaros L; Eaker ED
J Public Health Manag Pract; 1996; 2(3):54-9. PubMed ID: 10186680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.
Lantz PM; Stencil D; Lippert MT; Beversdorf S; Jaros L; Remington PL
Am J Public Health; 1995 Jun; 85(6):834-6. PubMed ID: 7646664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of ENCOREplus. A community-based breast and cervical cancer screening program.
Fernandez ME; DeBor M; Candreia MJ; Wagner AK; Stewart KR
Am J Prev Med; 1999 Apr; 16(3 Suppl):35-49. PubMed ID: 10198679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income women: impact of a simple centralized HMO intervention.
Hardy RE; Eckert C; Hargreaves MK; Belay Y; Jones TN; Cebrun AJ
J Natl Med Assoc; 1996 Jun; 88(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 8691500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis.
Wagner TH
Am J Prev Med; 1998 Jan; 14(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9476837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.
Kaczorowski J; Karwalajtys T; Lohfeld L; Laryea S; Anderson K; Roder S; Sebaldt RJ
Can Fam Physician; 2009 Jun; 55(6):622-3.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19509209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.
Luckmann R; White MJ; Costanza ME; Frisard CF; Cranos C; Sama S; Yood R
Transl Behav Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28452044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and pap tests.
Valanis BG; Glasgow RE; Mullooly J; Vogt TM; Whitlock EP; Boles SM; Smith KS; Kimes TM
Prev Med; 2002 Jan; 34(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 11749095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Reform, Medicaid Expansions, and Women's Cancer Screening.
Ku L; Bysshe T; Steinmetz E; Bruen BK
Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 26926159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization.
Dietrich AJ; Tobin JN; Cassells A; Robinson CM; Reh M; Romero KA; Flood AB; Beach ML
Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 17664498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
Paskett ED; Tatum CM; Mack DW; Hoen H; Case LD; Velez R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Signed family physician reminder letters to women overdue for screening mammography: A randomized clinical trial.
Chan EK; Wilson C; Tyldesley S; Olivotto IA; Lai A; Sam J; Harry R; Nichol A
J Med Screen; 2018 Sep; 25(3):149-154. PubMed ID: 29157121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.
Hegenscheid K; Hoffmann W; Fochler S; Domin M; Weiss S; Hartmann B; Bick U; Hosten N
Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 21961470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).
Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
