128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186890)
1. The failed Patient Self-Determination Act and policy alternatives for the right to die.
Yates JL; Glick HR
J Aging Soc Policy; 1997; 9(4):29-50. PubMed ID: 10186890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
Wing KR
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical decisions at the end-of-life: lessons from America.
Tan SY
Hawaii Med J; 1995 Apr; 54(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 7601680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preserving end-of-life autonomy: the Patient Self-Determination Act and the Uniform Health Care Decisions Act.
Galambos CM
Health Soc Work; 1998 Nov; 23(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 9834880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision.
Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C
N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From the Office of the General Counsel. The right to die after Cruzan.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1990 Nov; 264(18):2444-6. PubMed ID: 2232004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal briefing: the new Patient Self-Determination Act.
Pope TM
J Clin Ethics; 2013; 24(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 23923815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care.
Zuckerman C
Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.
Rouse F
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public policy in the wake of Cruzan: a case study of New York's health care proxy law.
Miller TE
Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 2089189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The case of Nancy Cruzan: the Supreme Court's decision.
Guarino KS; Antoine MP
Crit Care Nurse; 1991 Jan; 11(1):32, 34-6, 38-40. PubMed ID: 1899067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuing problems with patient self-determination.
White BD; Singer PA; Siegler M
Am J Med Qual; 1993; 8(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 8161890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct.
Gostin L; Weir RF
Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When patients have a legal right to die. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
Dolin LC
Internist; 1995 Mar; 36(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 10141221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suing health care providers for saving lives. Liability for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment.
Rodriguez KF
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):1-66. PubMed ID: 10230150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The best interests of persistently vegetative patients: to die rather that to live?
Chan TK; Tipoe GL
J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 23389103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
