116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186916)
1. GAO's role in the evaluation of federal health programs.
Nadel MV
Eval Health Prof; 1996 Sep; 19(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 10186916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Government Accountability Office Reports on Children's Oral Health and Dental Care: A 31-Year Retrospective Analysis.
Edelstein BL; Huang T; Greco CJ; Rodriguez I
Pediatr Dent; 2022 Nov; 44(6):404-410. PubMed ID: 36947758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. GAO audit not apt to find pervasive fraud in CARE Act.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Dec; 14(22):4. PubMed ID: 11366658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. H.R. 3 restructures agencies that investigate fraud in federal health care programs, Part 1.
Weissburg C; Klein RA
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Jun; 11(4):39-42. PubMed ID: 10307426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Control of fraud and abuse in Medicare and Medicaid.
Pies HE
Am J Law Med; 1977; 3(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 415602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicare fraud and abuse.
Scala-Foley M; Bryant N
Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2004; 5(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 15378810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies.
Arkes HR
Psychol Sci; 2003 Jan; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12564746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple program participation: comparison of nutrition and food assistance program benefits with food costs in Boston, Massachusetts.
Wiecha JL; Palombo R
Am J Public Health; 1989 May; 79(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 2705593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combating fraud in health care: an essential component of any cost containment strategy.
Morris L
Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(5):1351-6. PubMed ID: 19738251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revise or preserve? A flurry of views on revision of tax-exemption standards.
McGovern JJ
Health Prog; 1992; 73(1):38-41, 64. PubMed ID: 10115597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving return-to-work strategies in the United States disability programs, with analysis of program practices in Germany and Sweden.
Sim J
Soc Secur Bull; 1999; 62(3):41-50. PubMed ID: 10732370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The design of failure: health policy and the structure of federalism.
Vladeck BC
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1979; 4(3):522-535. PubMed ID: 391858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the federal level.
Ferko JG
Emergency; 1987 Sep; 19(9):37-8, 64-5, 69. PubMed ID: 10284122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal initiatives to support rapid learning about new technologies.
Tunis SR; Carino TV; Williams RD; Bach PB
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):w140-9. PubMed ID: 17259196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Public Health Service programs under the Government Performance and Results Act.
Straw RB
Eval Health Prof; 1996 Sep; 19(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 10186923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A national policy for health care technology assessment.
Perry S; Pillar B
Med Care Rev; 1990; 47(4):401-17. PubMed ID: 10113012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health care fraud: a primer on the schemes and the tools to fight health care fraud.
Morris L
J Insur Med; 1993; 25(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 10150786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An American approach to health system reform.
Holahan J; Moon M; Welch WP; Zuckerman S
JAMA; 1991 May; 265(19):2537-40. PubMed ID: 2020072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 12347484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overcoming barriers to evaluating federal health education and training programs.
Baumgartner L; Stenersen S; Campbell K
Eval Health Prof; 1996 Sep; 19(3):292-310. PubMed ID: 10186917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
