231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186939)
1. Are cost-benefits of PACS real or illusory?
Page D
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Oct; Suppl Peers On P():12-3. PubMed ID: 10186939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Teleradiology, mini-PACS, PACS and the digital medical image system.
Swartz D
Telemed Today; 1996; 4(6):32-5. PubMed ID: 10165148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Filmless automation: from vision to reality.
Reicher MA
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jun; 14(6):24-5, 32-5. PubMed ID: 10155041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost models analyze value of clinical PACS.
Vanden Brink J; Strauss J
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1995 Oct; 17(10):35-8. PubMed ID: 10159848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can you justify the cost of installing PACS?
Healthc Inform; 1992 Mar; 9(3):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10117889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Multivendor phased approach: an alternative route to PACS.
Smith EM; Wandtke JC; Robinson AE
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jan; 21(1):55-7, 59-60. PubMed ID: 11692386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "We'll leave the light on.".
Cannavo MJ
Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(6):46-8. PubMed ID: 12546019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost finding in the diagnostic imaging service.
Mobilia G
Rays; 1998; 23(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 9689857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the road to PACS--confronting the issues.
Grosskopf EJ
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 10186415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internet approach promises cost-benefits to PACS users.
Gropper A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Feb; 21(2):59-62, 64. PubMed ID: 10351550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a surge in demand for PACS on the horizon?
Gillespie G
Health Data Manag; 2002 Nov; 10(11):62-5, 68. PubMed ID: 12436877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is PACS worth the investment? it depends on your perspective.
Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):284-5. PubMed ID: 17411583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiology department overhead expenses.
Bell RA
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):271. PubMed ID: 11426011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A financial analysis of digital image acquisition for portable and table-top radiography.
Stockburger WT
Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10291951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
Stockburger WT
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost justification.
Inamura K
Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):41. PubMed ID: 10313132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Cheshire Cat of medical imaging.
Vanden Brink J
Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 10293543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bridging the film-digital gap.
Brovold R
Adm Radiol; 1991 Nov; 10(11):57, 59-61. PubMed ID: 10115721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Film-free efficiency systems: a new cost-effective approach.
Reicher MA
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(5):51-5. PubMed ID: 10186419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiovascular PACS: recent KLAS findings.
Bikman J
Healthc Q; 2006; 9(3):88-90, 92, 4. PubMed ID: 16826772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
