These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10186971)
21. Natural rubber latex protein reduction with an emphasis on enzyme treatment. Perrella FW; Gaspari AA Methods; 2002 May; 27(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 12079421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Couriers of asthma: antigenic proteins in natural rubber latex. Petsonk EL Occup Med; 2000; 15(2):421-30. PubMed ID: 10769347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A study of natural rubber latex allergens in gloves used by healthcare workers in Singapore. Koh D; Ng V; Leow YH; Goh CL Br J Dermatol; 2005 Nov; 153(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16225605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Special report: the truth about condoms. Barriers to better condom "killing people"; regulatory, political hurdles stifle development. Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jan; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12319318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials. Walsh TL; Frezieres RG; Peacock K; Nelson AL; Clark VA; Bernstein L; Wraxall BG Contraception; 2004 Nov; 70(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 15504381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cross-Reactivity studies of gutta-percha, gutta-balata, and natural rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis). Costa GE; Johnson JD; Hamilton RG J Endod; 2001 Sep; 27(9):584-7. PubMed ID: 11556564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Allergic contact dermatitis from natural latex. Gottlöber P; Gall H; Peter RU Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 11526517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of B- and T-cell responses and HLA-DR4 binding motifs of the latex allergen Hev b 6.01 (prohevein) and its post-transcriptionally formed proteins Hev b 6.02 and Hev b 6.03. Raulf-Heimsoth M; Rozynek P; Brüning T; Rihs HP Allergy; 2004 Jul; 59(7):724-33. PubMed ID: 15180759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two different cell culture methods in evaluation of biocompatibility of latex urinary catheters. Korhonen P; Talja M; Ruutu M; Andersson LC; Alfthan O Urol Res; 1991; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 1853515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Latex allergy and cross-reactions: a new threat?]. Stevens W Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2000; 62(2):155-67; discussion 167-70. PubMed ID: 10818822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Getting a piece of the condom pie. AIDS Alert; 1995 Jan; 10(1):8. PubMed ID: 11362174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The biological safety of condom material can be determined using an in vitro cell culture system. Motsoane NA; Pretorius E; Bester MJ; Becker PJ Anal Cell Pathol; 2001; 23(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 11904460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Effect of silicon and latex urinary catheters: a comparative study]. Huang WY; Wei LP; Ji YG; Xu DX; Mo JK Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1026-8. PubMed ID: 16109568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hev b 5 and Hev b 13 as allergen markers to estimate the allergenic potency of latex gloves. Yeang HY; Arif SA; Raulf-Heimsoth M; Loke YH; Sander I; Sulong SH; Lau CH; Hamilton RG J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Sep; 114(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 15356563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Special report: the truth about condoms. Will your clients want the plastic condom? Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jan; 16(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 12319321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]