158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10187178)
1. Marketplace. AMA sets campaign to punish doctors who base testimony on 'junk science'.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Nov; 52(46):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10187178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of the inexpert witness, or ... do you trust chickens to guard the coop?
Victoroff MS
Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):14-6. PubMed ID: 12369343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How do expert witnesses get away with lying?
Crane M
Med Econ; 1999 Jan; 76(1):152, 154, 163-4. PubMed ID: 10351077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statement on the physician acting as an expert witness.
Patient Safety and Professional Liability Committee, American College of Surgeons
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 92(12):24-5. PubMed ID: 18179114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improper expert medical testimony. Existing and proposed mechanisms of oversight.
McAbee GN
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):257-72. PubMed ID: 9658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should expert testimony be required in disciplinary proceedings against dentists accused of malpractice or incompetency?
Morris WO
J Law Ethics Dent; 1989; 2(3-4):143-8. PubMed ID: 2640234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical liability cases (S93-3). American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Medical Liability.
Pediatrics; 1994 Nov; 94(5):755-6. PubMed ID: 7936914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues related to medical expert testimony.
Hammond CB; Schwartz PA
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 16260525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical guidelines for expert medical witnesses.
Hendricks WM
N C Med J; 1989 Jul; 50(7):378-9. PubMed ID: 2755516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony.
Muroff JA; Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 17411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Junk science" and the legal system.
McFadden J
Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 1998; 65(3):5. PubMed ID: 14621505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.
Williams MA; Mackin GA; Beresford HR; Gordon J; Jacobson PL; McQuillen MP; Reimschisel TE; Taylor RM; Bernat JL; Rizzo M; Snyder RD; Sagsveen MG; Amery M; Brannon WL;
Neurology; 2006 Jan; 66(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16401838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Junk science--is peer review the answer?
Brumback RA
J Child Neurol; 1995 May; 10(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7642885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The verdict on 'junk science'.
Wood TP
CAP Today; 1998 Feb; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 10177237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is "junk science" finally on the way out?
Crane M
Med Econ; 1996 Apr; 73(8):59-61, 65-6. PubMed ID: 10157438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. American Psychiatric Association resource document on peer review of expert testimony.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 9323661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prescription drugs, expert witnesses, and medical licenses.
George JE; Rouse AR
J Med Soc N J; 1982 Dec; 79(13):969-70. PubMed ID: 6961220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recommended criteria for expert witnesses. Board of Governors' Ad Hoc Task Force to develop recommendations for malpractice reform. American College of Cardiology.
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):250. PubMed ID: 8522704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Expert witnesses: perpetuating a flawed system and ethical issues related to medical expert testimony.
Patsner B
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):739; author reply 739. PubMed ID: 16507950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
Hawkins TS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
