These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10187443)
21. Study: using lower volumes of contrast media can produce reasonable quality CT studies. Health Devices; 2012 Jul; 41(7):229-30. PubMed ID: 23444659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Nonionic contrast agents: clinical and cost considerations. Wolf G Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 10311703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. HEW asks full proof of efficacy, cost effectiveness of scanners. Foley HA Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10306188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Technology in medicine: blessing or curse? Johns RJ Forum Med; 1980 Jun; 3(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 10309193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. From the desk of the president: the way ahead. Berman D J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2008; 2(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 19083976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. CAT scanners--conferring "the greatest benefit on mankind". Relman AS N Engl J Med; 1979 Nov; 301(19):1062-3. PubMed ID: 114832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiologists' knowledge and perceptions of the impact of contrast-induced nephropathy and its risk factors when performing computed tomography examinations: a survey of European radiologists. Reddan D; Fishman EK Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 17728089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management company officials comment on operation of scanners. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 10306195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Nation's radiologists at the front in battle between technology and cost controls. Breo DL Am Med News; 1980 Oct; 23(39):6. PubMed ID: 10248810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiologist says limit on scanner procedures is too tough. Evens RG Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Mar; 11(2):32-3. PubMed ID: 10306193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s. Radensky PW; Cahill NE Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):310-1; discussion 312-5. PubMed ID: 9114079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New CT codes to take to heart. Duszak R J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Nov; 2(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 17411971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Computed tomography: a cost-benefit problem (author's transl)]. Farga V Rev Med Chil; 1980 Apr; 108(4):359. PubMed ID: 6776603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonionic agents: okay, they're safer--but how much safer and at what cost to society? Levin D Adm Radiol; 1990 Nov; 9(11):97-8. PubMed ID: 10113413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness and role of routine skull radiography. Gettelfinger DM Neurology; 1979 Mar; 29(3):420-1. PubMed ID: 109787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical prediction rules in trauma imaging: who, how, and why? Blackmore CC Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 15858080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]