BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10188312)

  • 1. [Organized breast cancer screening: experience at Bouches-du-Rhône].
    Seradour B
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1665-7. PubMed ID: 10188312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the performance and impact of breast cancer screening programmes in East Anglia, U.K. and Bouches du Rhône, France.
    McCann J; Wait S; Séradour B; Day N
    Eur J Cancer; 1997 Mar; 33(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 9155528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district].
    Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B
    Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experience in mass screening of breast cancer with mammography in France].
    Mamelle N; Lacour A; Anes A; Bazin B; Chaperon J; Duru G; Piette C; San Marco JL; Schaffer P; Arnold F
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 8134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prospective view concerning organization of breast cancer screening in France].
    Baudier F
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1647-57. PubMed ID: 10188310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of mass screening for breast cancer in the Somme district (France) between 1990 and 1996].
    Ganry O; Peng J; Dubreuil A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Sep; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 10519174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR; Autier P
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Breast cancer screening. From the experimental phase to generalization].
    Jestin C
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1659-63. PubMed ID: 10188311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breast cancer screening: ethical problems. The Strasbourg experiment. Deontological issues raised by breast cancer screening: quality assurance and accreditation of structures].
    Haehnel P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1635-45; discussion 1646. PubMed ID: 10188309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Anthropological studies of the representations of menopause in a population of women invited to a mass screening for breast cancer in Bouches-du-Rhône and Charente].
    Barreau B; Fontanges M; Dilhuydy MH; Séradour B; Hoarau H; Hubert A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Apr; 28(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 10859893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast cancer--screening data for assessing quality of services--New York, 2000-2003.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jun; 53(21):455-7. PubMed ID: 15175570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in Trent Regional Health Authority's breast screening programme.
    Thornhill P
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Apr; 56(635):11-3. PubMed ID: 2363814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [What is the benefit of screening for breast cancer? Contra].
    Schmidt JG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S178-98. PubMed ID: 9133272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The cost of breast cancer screening in France].
    Wait S; Schaffer P; Séradour B; Guldenfels C; Gairard B; Morin F; Piana L
    J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 81(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 10915994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
    Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast cancer screening in France].
    Philip T; Kasparian C; Fagnani F; Moatti JP; Meunier A
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2005 Feb; 189(2):321-36; discussion 336-9. PubMed ID: 16114862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Using medical imaging for a comprehensive breast cancer screening program].
    Dilhuydy MH
    Bull Cancer; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1071-86. PubMed ID: 19887333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.