These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10188405)

  • 1. Whose life is it anyway?
    Rau-Foster M
    ANNA J; 1998 Dec; 25(6):657. PubMed ID: 10188405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal and ethical issues. The choice to die.
    Kjervik DK
    J Prof Nurs; 1991; 7(3):151. PubMed ID: 2061521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advance directives. Whose death is it, anyway?
    Cornell S
    Adv Nurse Pract; 1998 Jul; 6(7):68-70. PubMed ID: 9782803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comment. Defining the right to die.
    English DM
    Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 10129269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whose right is it, anyway?
    Andrews J
    Nurs Times; 1989 Nov 22-28; 85(47):24. PubMed ID: 2602178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advance patient directives: preserving consumer choice.
    Renick O; Hanson S; Nelson M
    Med Interface; 1994 Apr; 7(4):84-7 contd. PubMed ID: 10133362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To die or not to die.
    Payne L
    Nurs Stand; 2001 Oct 10-16; 16(4):21. PubMed ID: 11977818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Death by default.
    Lindgren J
    Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nurses to educate for end-of-life decisions.
    Am Nurse; 1992 Jan; 24(1):9. PubMed ID: 1729956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning ahead for difficult health care decisions.
    Mishkin B
    Healthspan; 1987 Apr; 4(4):3-25. PubMed ID: 10281748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safeguarding choice at the end of life.
    Wilkinson D
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):575-6. PubMed ID: 26209723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Living wills, health-care proxies, and the physicians' code of ethics.
    Lesse S
    Am J Psychother; 1988 Jan; 42(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 3354718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voluntary euthanasia: private and public imperatives.
    Bok S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 8088997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospitals, doctors and the right to die.
    Havighurst C
    Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(3):27-30. PubMed ID: 10158555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. After Cruzan: The right to die.
    Lippman H
    RN; 1991 Jan; 54(1):65-6, 68, 70, 73. PubMed ID: 1989061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting patients' end-of-life choices.
    Tammelleo AD
    RN; 2000 Aug; 63(8):75-7, 79. PubMed ID: 10983181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health.
    Craig P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Dec; 22(12):375-9. PubMed ID: 10296700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighing the right to die. The Supreme Court will decide: can doctors help their patients kill themselves?
    Reibstein L; Klaidman D
    Newsweek; 1997 Jan; 129(2):62. PubMed ID: 10164152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective.
    Drane JF
    Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A right-to-die reminder. A new law requires hospitals to read you your medical rights.
    Podolsky D
    US News World Rep; 1991 Dec; 111(23):74. PubMed ID: 10115526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.