175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10188848)
1. The pathological distinction between "deep penetrating" dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Wick MR; Ritter JH; Lind AC; Swanson PE
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 1999 Mar; 18(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 10188848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expression of CD163 in dermatofibroma, cellular fibrous histiocytoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: comparison with CD68, CD34, and Factor XIIIa.
Sachdev R; Sundram U
J Cutan Pathol; 2006 May; 33(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 16640542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differential expression of HMGA1 and HMGA2 in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: potential diagnostic applications, and comparison with histologic findings, CD34, and factor XIIIa immunoreactivity.
Li N; McNiff J; Hui P; Manfioletti G; Tallini G
Am J Dermatopathol; 2004 Aug; 26(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 15249855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CD34 and factor-XIIIa immunoreactivity in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and dermatofibroma.
Goldblum JR; Tuthill RJ
Am J Dermatopathol; 1997 Apr; 19(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 9129699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stromelysin-3 expression in the differential diagnosis of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: comparison with factor XIIIa and CD34.
Kim HJ; Lee JY; Kim SH; Seo YJ; Lee JH; Park JK; Kim MH; Cinn YW; Cho KH; Yoon TY
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 157(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 17596171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High proliferative activity excludes dermatofibroma: report of the utility of MIB-1 in the differential diagnosis of selected fibrohistiocytic tumors.
Hanly AJ; Jordà M; Elgart GW; Badiavas E; Nassiri M; Nadji M
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Jun; 130(6):831-4. PubMed ID: 16740036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immunohistochemical markers in fibrohistiocytic lesions: factor XIIIa, CD34, S-100 and p75.
West KL; Cardona DM; Su Z; Puri PK
Am J Dermatopathol; 2014 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 24162384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CD99 expression in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and dermatofibroma.
Kazlouskaya V; Malhotra S; Kabigting FD; Lal K; Elston DM
Am J Dermatopathol; 2014 May; 36(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 24247571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phosphohistone-H3 and Ki67: Useful Markers in Differentiating Dermatofibroma From Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans and Atypical Fibrohistiocytic Lesions.
Agarwal A; Gopinath A; Tetzlaff MT; Prieto VG
Am J Dermatopathol; 2017 Jul; 39(7):504-507. PubMed ID: 28609344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: differential expression of CD34 and factor XIIIa.
Cohen PR; Rapin RP; Farhood AI
Am J Dermatopathol; 1994 Oct; 16(5):573-4. PubMed ID: 7528477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tenascin differentiates dermatofibroma from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: comparison with CD34 and factor XIIIa.
Kahn HJ; Fekete E; From L
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 11172295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Differences of the molecular phenotypes and the histogenesis between dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans].
Xiong Y; Guo H; Zhang S; Zhang B; Li T
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Aug; 40(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 18677387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Giant cell fibroblastoma in a child misdiagnosed as a dermatofibroma.
Nguyen CM; Burch JM; Fitzpatrick JE; Peterson SL; Weston WL
Pediatr Dermatol; 2002; 19(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11860566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep penetrating dermatofibroma versus dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A clinicopathologic comparison.
Zelger B; Sidoroff A; Stanzl U; Fritsch PO; Ofner D; Zelger B; Jasani B; Schmid KW
Am J Surg Pathol; 1994 Jul; 18(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 8017562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrophic variants of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Zelger BW; Ofner D; Zelger BG
Histopathology; 1995 Jun; 26(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 7545142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CD34 and factor XIIIa in the differential diagnosis of dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Abenoza P; Lillemoe T
Am J Dermatopathol; 1993 Oct; 15(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 7694515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fat necrosis with an associated lymphocytic infiltrate represents a histopathologic clue that distinguishes cellular dermatofibroma from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Schechter SA; Bresler SC; Patel RM
J Cutan Pathol; 2020 Oct; 47(10):913-916. PubMed ID: 32412128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of collagen refractility in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans using diffractive microscopy.
Brailsford C; Khamdan F; Dirr MA; Sagut P; Nietert PJ; Elston D
J Cutan Pathol; 2024 Apr; 51(4):306-310. PubMed ID: 38124386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sclerosing Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Shows Significant Overlap With Sclerotic Fibroma in Both Routine and Immunohistochemical Analysis: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.
Abdaljaleel MY; North JP
Am J Dermatopathol; 2017 Feb; 39(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 28134725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. COL1A1:PDGFB chimeric transcripts are not present in indeterminate fibrohistiocytic lesions of the skin.
Wang WL; Patel KU; Coleman NM; Smith-Zagone MJ; Ivan D; Reed JA; López-Terrada D; Lazar AJ; Prieto VG
Am J Dermatopathol; 2010 Apr; 32(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 19940748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
