BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10189270)

  • 1. Precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response model for tolerance and rebound phenomena.
    Sharma A; Ebling WF; Jusko WJ
    J Pharm Sci; 1998 Dec; 87(12):1577-84. PubMed ID: 10189270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mathematical assessment of properties of precursor-dependent indirect pharmacodynamic response models.
    Hazra A; Krzyzanski W; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2006 Dec; 33(6):683-717. PubMed ID: 17053985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.
    Sharma A; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1996 Dec; 24(6):611-35. PubMed ID: 9300353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated functions for four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic response.
    Krzyzanski W; Jusko WJ
    J Pharm Sci; 1998 Jan; 87(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of pharmacodynamic recession slopes for direct and indirect response models.
    Krzyzanski W; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1998 Aug; 26(4):409-36. PubMed ID: 10214560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mathematical formalism for the properties of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.
    Krzyzanski W; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1997 Feb; 25(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 9353696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mathematical formalism and characteristics of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses for drug infusions.
    Krzyzanski W; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1998 Aug; 26(4):385-408. PubMed ID: 10214559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect analysis of intravenous RGD891, a platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonist, using mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM).
    Zannikos PN; Rohatagi S; Jensen BK; DePhillips SL; Rhodes GR
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 40(10):1129-40. PubMed ID: 11028252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic concepts of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling.
    Meibohm B; Derendorf H
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Oct; 35(10):401-13. PubMed ID: 9352388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tolerance to the prolactin-secreting effect of chlorprothixene after different modes of drug administration.
    Bagli M; Süverkrüp R; Quadflieg R; Höflich G; Kasper S; Möller HJ; Langer M; Barlage U; Rao ML
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1999 Nov; 291(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 10525070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the time of maximum effect site concentration to combine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
    Minto CF; Schnider TW; Gregg KM; Henthorn TK; Shafer SL
    Anesthesiology; 2003 Aug; 99(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 12883405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid during tolerance in rats: effects on extracellular dopamine.
    Raybon JJ; Boje KM
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2007 Mar; 320(3):1252-60. PubMed ID: 17138862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of a cellular pharmacodynamic model exhibiting sharp response sensitivity and tolerance.
    Siegel RA
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Feb; 34(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 17160695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of drug interactions relevant to pharmacodynamic indirect response models.
    Earp J; Krzyzanski W; Chakraborty A; Zamacona MK; Jusko WJ
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2004 Oct; 31(5):345-80. PubMed ID: 15669772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A semi-compartmental model describing the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship.
    Ki S
    Anesth Pain Med (Seoul); 2020 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33329783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of dosage regimen in controlling indirect pharmacodynamic responses.
    Gobburu JV; Jusko WJ
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2001 Mar; 46(1-3):45-57. PubMed ID: 11259832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the dose-dependent time of peak effect in indirect response models.
    Majumdar A
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1998 Apr; 26(2):183-206. PubMed ID: 9795881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling in vivo.
    Holford NH; Sheiner LB
    Crit Rev Bioeng; 1981; 5(4):273-322. PubMed ID: 7023829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intermittent adaptation. A theory of drug tolerance, dependence and addiction.
    Peper A
    Pharmacopsychiatry; 2009 May; 42 Suppl 1():S129-43. PubMed ID: 19434551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharmacodynamics of morphine-induced neuronal nitric oxide production and antinociceptive tolerance development.
    Heinzen EL; Pollack GM
    Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 1023(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 15374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.