209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10191580)
1. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
Fernandez L; Canut JA
Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
Blalock KA; Powers JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.
Elsaka SE; Hammad SM; Ibrahim NF
Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):33. PubMed ID: 24934213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
Arici S; Regan D
Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
Chung CH; Friedman SD; Mante FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 12226610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
Fox NA; McCabe JF
Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design.
Willems G; Carels CE; Verbeke G
J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):271-8. PubMed ID: 9175357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro.
Buzzitta VA; Hallgren SE; Powers JM
Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6758593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are flowable resin-based composites a reliable material for metal orthodontic bracket bonding?
Pick B; Rosa V; Azeredo TR; Cruz Filho EA; Miranda WG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20953560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems.
Webster MJ; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Khajotia SS; Sinha PK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11174540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
