These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10192324)

  • 21. An old problem that may be getting worse.
    Niederhuber JE
    Ann Surg; 2008 Feb; 247(2):222-3. PubMed ID: 18216526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Academies seek better prospects for postdocs.
    Ebert J
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):426. PubMed ID: 15791219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Universities and the money fix.
    Martinson BC
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):141-2. PubMed ID: 17851495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. America recovers: stimulus-response.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2011 Sep; 477(7366):524-5. PubMed ID: 21956310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Universities unnerved by revised rules for sharing NIH research.
    Jennings C
    Nature; 2004 Aug; 430(7003):953. PubMed ID: 15329680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Managing the business of science.
    Boron WF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2009 Feb; 24():2-3. PubMed ID: 19196646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. National Institutes of Health: the lottery.
    Heilman KM
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Jul; 62(1):106. PubMed ID: 17474112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. It is apparent that there has been a paradigm shift in the evaluation and funding of research. Interview by Dr. Rae Silver.
    Mitler M
    Horm Behav; 2006 Jun; 50(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 16616751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Funding shouldn't rely on competing death tolls.
    Hilbert D
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7036):956. PubMed ID: 15846318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. NIH grants $117 million in COBRE awards.
    National Center for Research Resources
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):28N. PubMed ID: 17133707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stats and facts. Increasing U.S. health research expenditures.
    Manag Care Interface; 2001 Oct; 14(10):34-5. PubMed ID: 11688091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AIDS office opposes outside planning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6577):5. PubMed ID: 8609987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Databases in peril.
    Merali Z; Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1010-1. PubMed ID: 15973369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.