These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The role of antisense transcription in the regulation of X-inactivation. Rougeulle C; Avner P Curr Top Dev Biol; 2004; 63():61-89. PubMed ID: 15536014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tsix, a gene antisense to Xist at the X-inactivation centre. Lee JT; Davidow LS; Warshawsky D Nat Genet; 1999 Apr; 21(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 10192391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of developmentally specific enhancers for Tsix in the regulation of X chromosome inactivation. Stavropoulos N; Rowntree RK; Lee JT Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Apr; 25(7):2757-69. PubMed ID: 15767680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular cloning of antisense transcripts of the mouse Xist gene. Mise N; Goto Y; Nakajima N; Takagi N Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1999 May; 258(3):537-41. PubMed ID: 10329421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A functional role for Tsix transcription in blocking Xist RNA accumulation but not in X-chromosome choice. Stavropoulos N; Lu N; Lee JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Aug; 98(18):10232-7. PubMed ID: 11481444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetics. Do X chromosomes set boundaries? Percec I; Bartolomei MS Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5553):287-8. PubMed ID: 11786631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional intergenic transcription: a case study of the X-inactivation centre. Lee JT Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2003 Aug; 358(1436):1417-23; discussion 1423. PubMed ID: 14511490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is X-chromosome inactivation a homology effect? Lee JT Adv Genet; 2002; 46():25-48. PubMed ID: 11931227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Molecular mechanisms of X chromosome inactivation]. Sado T Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2006 Dec; 51(16 Suppl):2471-7. PubMed ID: 17471965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening of the C43G mutation in the promoter region of the XIST gene in females with highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Pereira LV; Zatz M Am J Med Genet; 1999 Nov; 87(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 10528256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Epigenetic aspects of X-chromosome dosage compensation. Park Y; Kuroda MI Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5532):1083-5. PubMed ID: 11498577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Familial cases of point mutations in the XIST promoter reveal a correlation between CTCF binding and pre-emptive choices of X chromosome inactivation. Pugacheva EM; Tiwari VK; Abdullaev Z; Vostrov AA; Flanagan PT; Quitschke WW; Loukinov DI; Ohlsson R; Lobanenkov VV Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Apr; 14(7):953-65. PubMed ID: 15731119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of the transcriptional regulatory network in the model organisms: yeast and sea urchin]. Takamatsu K; Takeda T Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2004 Dec; 49(17 Suppl):2742-50. PubMed ID: 15669249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. CTCF, a candidate trans-acting factor for X-inactivation choice. Chao W; Huynh KD; Spencer RJ; Davidow LS; Lee JT Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5553):345-7. PubMed ID: 11743158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]