These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10193048)

  • 1. Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations.
    Schyns PG; Oliva A
    Cognition; 1999 Jan; 69(3):243-65. PubMed ID: 10193048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.
    Gosselin F; Schyns PG
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2261-71. PubMed ID: 11448718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual, categorical, and affective processing of ambiguous smiling facial expressions.
    Calvo MG; Fernández-Martín A; Nummenmaa L
    Cognition; 2012 Dec; 125(3):373-93. PubMed ID: 22939734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face gender and emotion expression: are angry women more like men?
    Hess U; Adams RB; Grammer K; Kleck RE
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):19.1-8. PubMed ID: 20053110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How task shapes the use of information during facial expression categorizations.
    Smith ML; Merlusca C
    Emotion; 2014 Jun; 14(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 24708495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks.
    Becker DV; Anderson US; Mortensen CR; Neufeld SL; Neel R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):637-59. PubMed ID: 21744984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Following the time course of face gender and expression processing: a task-dependent ERP study.
    Valdés-Conroy B; Aguado L; Fernández-Cahill M; Romero-Ferreiro V; Diéguez-Risco T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 May; 92(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24594443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial frequency content on classification of face gender and expression.
    Aguado L; Serrano-Pedraza I; Rodríguez S; Román FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2010 Nov; 13(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 20977005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Faces in-between: evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency.
    Winkielman P; Olszanowski M; Gola M
    Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 25642724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading a smiling face: messages conveyed by various forms of smiling.
    Otta E; Folladore Abrosio F; Hoshino RL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 8823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early selection of diagnostic facial information in the human visual cortex.
    Joyce CA; Schyns PG; Gosselin F; Cottrell GW; Rossion B
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):800-13. PubMed ID: 16266735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.
    Stolier RM; Freeman JB
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(23):5711-5721. PubMed ID: 28483974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. You may look unhappy unless you smile: the distinctiveness of a smiling face against faces without an explicit smile.
    Park HB; Han JE; Hyun JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():185-94. PubMed ID: 25819385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli.
    Oliva A; Schyns PG
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Oct; 34(1):72-107. PubMed ID: 9325010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier.
    Carr EW; Brady TF; Winkielman P
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1087-1102. PubMed ID: 28594281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: a meta-analysis.
    Nummenmaa L; Calvo MG
    Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 25706834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity is associated with optimal adaptation of response bias to perceptual sensitivity in emotion perception.
    Lynn SK; Ibagon C; Bui E; Palitz SA; Simon NM; Barrett LF
    Emotion; 2016 Mar; 16(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 26461251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and auditory socio-cognitive perception in unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy in children and adolescents: a prospective controlled study.
    Laurent A; Arzimanoglou A; Panagiotakaki E; Sfaello I; Kahane P; Ryvlin P; Hirsch E; de Schonen S
    Epileptic Disord; 2014 Dec; 16(4):456-70. PubMed ID: 25498848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorizing facial identities, emotions, and genders: attention to high- and low-spatial frequencies by children and adults.
    Deruelle C; Fagot J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Feb; 90(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 15683861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The confounded nature of angry men and happy women.
    Becker DV; Kenrick DT; Neuberg SL; Blackwell KC; Smith DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 17279844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.