These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10193281)

  • 1. Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery after epidural analgesia for labour with ropivacaine and bupivacaine: a prospective meta-analysis.
    Writer WD; Stienstra R; Eddleston JM; Gatt SP; Griffin R; Gutsche BB; Joyce TH; Hedlund C; Heeroma K; Selander D
    Br J Anaesth; 1998 Nov; 81(5):713-7. PubMed ID: 10193281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery.
    Gaiser RR; Venkateswaren P; Cheek TG; Persiley E; Buxbaum J; Hedge J; Joyce TH; Gutsche BB
    J Clin Anesth; 1997 Nov; 9(7):564-8. PubMed ID: 9347433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mode of delivery following labor epidural analgesia: influence of ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
    Litwin AA
    AANA J; 2001 Aug; 69(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 11759364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor pain: effect on labor, delivery and neonatal outcome of 0.125% bupivacaine vs 0.2% ropivacaine.
    Evron S; Glezerman M; Sadan O; Boaz M; Ezri T
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2004 Jan; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 15321432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pharmacokinetics and clinical effect during continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine 2.5 mg/ml or bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml for labour pain relief.
    Irestedt L; Ekblom A; Olofsson C; Dahlström AC; Emanuelsson BM
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1998 Sep; 42(8):890-6. PubMed ID: 9773132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 microgram ml-1 versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 microgram ml-1: a double-blind comparison during labour.
    Clément HJ; Caruso L; Lopez F; Broisin F; Blanc-Jouvan M; Derré-Brunet E; Thomasson A; Leboucher G; Viale JP
    Br J Anaesth; 2002 Jun; 88(6):809-13. PubMed ID: 12173198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Sultan P; Murphy C; Halpern S; Carvalho B
    Can J Anaesth; 2013 Sep; 60(9):840-54. PubMed ID: 23925722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidural infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for labor analgesia: a randomized, double-blind study of obstetric outcome.
    Lee BB; Ngan Kee WD; Ng FF; Lau TK; Wong ELY
    Anesth Analg; 2004 Apr; 98(4):1145-1152. PubMed ID: 15041615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour.
    Eddleston JM; Holland JJ; Griffin RP; Corbett A; Horsman EL; Reynolds F
    Br J Anaesth; 1996 Jan; 76(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 8672383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery.
    Cederholm I
    Drug Saf; 1997 Jun; 16(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 9241493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ropivacaine 2 mg/mL vs. bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL with sufentanil using patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour.
    Hofmann-Kiefer K; Saran K; Brederode A; Bernasconi H; Zwissler B; Schwender D
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Mar; 46(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 11939924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing bupivacaine with ropivacaine for labor analgesia.
    Halpern SH; Breen TW; Campbell DC; Muir HA; Kronberg J; Nunn R; Fick GH
    Anesthesiology; 2003 Jun; 98(6):1431-5. PubMed ID: 12766654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of motor block between ropivacaine and bupivacaine for continuous labor epidural analgesia.
    Merson N
    AANA J; 2001 Feb; 69(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11759140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ropivacaine 0.2% versus bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl: a double blind comparison for analgesia during labour.
    Dresner M; Freeman J; Calow C; Quinn A; Bamber J
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Dec; 85(6):826-9. PubMed ID: 11732513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of bupivacaine 0.2% and ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labour.
    Aşik I; Göktuğ A; Gülay I; Alkiş N; Uysalel A
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 12074415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.
    Sah N; Vallejo M; Phelps A; Finegold H; Mandell G; Ramanathan S
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 May; 19(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 17531731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical application of ropivacaine in obstetrics.
    Stienstra R
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2001 Aug; 1(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 11895139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia during labor].
    Sánchez-Conde P; Nicolás J; Rodríguez J; García-Castaño M; del Barrio E; Muriel C
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2001 May; 48(5):199-203. PubMed ID: 11412729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine, both with 0.0002% fentanyl, for analgesia during labour.
    Purdie NL; McGrady EM
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Feb; 59(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 14725515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses With Continuous Epidural Infusion for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study.
    Ojo OA; Mehdiratta JE; Gamez BH; Hunting J; Habib AS
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Feb; 130(2):426-435. PubMed ID: 30882524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.