These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Basis and clinical application of the "contingent negative variation" in "evoked response audiometry" (author's transl)]. Brix R Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Jan; 87(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1130075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold extrapolation for N1-latencies in auditory evoked responses. Arlinger S Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):147-52. PubMed ID: 1215704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical use of auditory evoked potentials. Stange G Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():574-90. PubMed ID: 1019443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric response audiometry in a clinical practice. Brackmann DE Laryngoscope; 1977 May; 87(5 Pt 2 Suppl 5):1-33. PubMed ID: 323607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological data and psychophysical measurement. Stephens SD; Hyde ML Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():622-32. PubMed ID: 1019447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Achievements of Soviet audiology and the prospects for its development]. Aslamazova VI Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1977; (6):39-52. PubMed ID: 339470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The practice of evoked potential audiometry. Picton TW; Smith AD Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Jun; 11(2):263-82. PubMed ID: 358061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Early potentials evoked by acoustic stimuli: further results (author's transl)]. Pignataro O Audiology; 1976; 15(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 962712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of the functional state of the auditory system by means of computer audiometry]. Belov IM; Glukhova EIu; Murav'eva KA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1978; (6):24-9. PubMed ID: 362678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) in normal children]. Papini M; Zappoli R Riv Neurol; 1972; 42(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 4658234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [EEG- and COR-audiometry in childhood within the frame of an age related mass screening]. Weymar P; Mahler KF; Schmieschek J; Stürzebecher J Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1974 Aug; 68(16):850-4. PubMed ID: 4440004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [New methods in the objective audiometry for the proof of simulation and for the determination of the differential thresholds for frequency and intensity (author's transl)]. Brix R Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Aug; 57(8):733-9. PubMed ID: 682792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Acoustic evoked potentials in patients with vocal problems in relation to their hearing in wide frequency range]. Zabolotnyĭ DI; Shidlovskaia TA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (2):12-5. PubMed ID: 9560976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of CNV in audiometry. Prevec TS; Lokar J; Cernelc S Audiology; 1974; 13(6):447-57. PubMed ID: 4416577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Proceedings: ERA-findings in paracusic children with normal auditory threshold]. Schunicht R Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1973 Dec; 205(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 4785506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]