342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10194564)
1. Equipment management risk rating system based on engineering endpoints.
James PJ
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 10194564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating medical equipment repair and maintenance metrics: a progress report.
Cohen T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 9051223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What you need to know about EQ56.
Kelley PW
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(1):68-9. PubMed ID: 19215175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Home health care: a new challenge for clinical engineers.
Anderson JT
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10194565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing maintenance intervals based on measurement reliability of engineering endpoints.
James PJ
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 10820638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capital equipment support: a new era in technical service.
Lewis J; Kelch D; Cicman JH; Norton M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8850591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The risks of: aftermarket parts.
Baird P
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; 45(6):458, 462-3. PubMed ID: 22107468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmark indicators for medical equipment repair and maintenance.
Cohen T; Bakuzonis C; Friedman SB; Roa RL
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1995; 29(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 7550498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. EQ56: leveling the playing field for medical management.
Kelley P
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 17190079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The advantages of: aftermarket parts.
Mirsberger B
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; 45(6):459-61. PubMed ID: 22107469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1: A new approach to device standards.
Schmidt M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(3):246-7. PubMed ID: 16796337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning from failure: the teachings of Petroski.
Schrenker R
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2007; 41(5):395-8. PubMed ID: 17992806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An equipment systems laboratory for the biomedical equipment technology curriculum.
Segalewitz SI; Matisz M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 8369865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance from the clinical engineering perspective. Interview by Ethan Hertz.
Keil O; Patton J; Fenningkoh G
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1989; 23(5):348-9, 351-2. PubMed ID: 2804491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An urgent plea for realistic preventive maintenance guidelines.
Ben-Zvi S
Med Instrum; 1982; 16(2):115-6. PubMed ID: 7186099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Data-driven PM intervals.
Acosta J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(6):439-41. PubMed ID: 11191346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk-oriented maintenance.
Capuano M; Koritko S
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 8850592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working smart: model-specific inspection procedures ensure quality, consistency.
Williams JS
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 20374119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Engineers in clinical engineering: does the need remain?
Goodman GR
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):80-1. PubMed ID: 9051236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New standard for medical equipment management programs.
Hertz E
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 8739004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
