These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10195206)

  • 1. Pros and cons of open peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 2(3):197-8. PubMed ID: 10195206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pros and cons of PROs: a dialogue on the peer review program.
    Nathanson P; Aronson P
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1985; 18(3):53-5. PubMed ID: 10273646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.
    Moed HF
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review and the evaluation of manuscripts.
    Crawford S
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1988 Jan; 76(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3370379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review.
    Roe IL
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):365. PubMed ID: 677147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review of scientific papers.
    Armstrong JS
    J Biol Response Mod; 1984; 3(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6707695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of peer review to scientific progress.
    Sly RM
    Ann Allergy; 1989 Aug; 63(2):85. PubMed ID: 2764318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The peer-review system.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 8336882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Peer review in medical journals].
    Matías-Guiu J
    Rev Neurol; 1996 Jul; 24(131):765-6. PubMed ID: 8681185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review and the New York State Dental Journal.
    Feinberg E
    N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 9333728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications.
    Weller AC
    MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speaking of peer review..
    Allen AD
    Arch Dermatol; 1989 Jul; 125(7):1001-2. PubMed ID: 2742386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimenting with peer review.
    Jabri E
    ACS Chem Biol; 2006 Jul; 1(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 17163762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information for peer reviewers.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1994 Apr; 150(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8162544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.