These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10195280)

  • 1. Combining sensitive database searches with multiple intermediates to detect distant homologues.
    Salamov AA; Suwa M; Orengo CA; Swindells MB
    Protein Eng; 1999 Feb; 12(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 10195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases.
    Pearson WR
    Protein Sci; 1995 Jun; 4(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 7549879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching protein sequence libraries: comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA algorithms.
    Pearson WR
    Genomics; 1991 Nov; 11(3):635-50. PubMed ID: 1774068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SALSA: improved protein database searching by a new algorithm for assembly of sequence fragments into gapped alignments.
    Rognes T; Seeberg E
    Bioinformatics; 1998; 14(10):839-45. PubMed ID: 9927712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative accuracy of methods for protein sequence similarity search.
    Agarwal P; States DJ
    Bioinformatics; 1998; 14(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 9520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ParAlign: a parallel sequence alignment algorithm for rapid and sensitive database searches.
    Rognes T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Apr; 29(7):1647-52. PubMed ID: 11266569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BLAST and FASTA similarity searching for multiple sequence alignment.
    Pearson WR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1079():75-101. PubMed ID: 24170396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ballast: blast post-processing based on locally conserved segments.
    Plewniak F; Thompson JD; Poch O
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Sep; 16(9):750-9. PubMed ID: 11108697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective protein sequence comparison.
    Pearson WR
    Methods Enzymol; 1996; 266():227-58. PubMed ID: 8743688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package.
    Pearson WR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2000; 132():185-219. PubMed ID: 10547837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods.
    Park J; Karplus K; Barrett C; Hughey R; Haussler D; Hubbard T; Chothia C
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Dec; 284(4):1201-10. PubMed ID: 9837738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of a rigorous transitive profile based search method to detect remotely similar proteins.
    Sandhya S; Chakrabarti S; Abhinandan KR; Sowdhamini R; Srinivasan N
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Dec; 23(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 16218755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing statistical significance scores of sequence comparison methods with structure similarity.
    Hulsen T; de Vlieg J; Leunissen JA; Groenen PM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 7():444. PubMed ID: 17038163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of residue pairs in protein sequence-sequence and sequence-structure alignments.
    Jung J; Lee B
    Protein Sci; 2000 Aug; 9(8):1576-88. PubMed ID: 10975579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the CATH domain database to assign structures and functions to the genome sequences.
    Pearl F; Todd AE; Bray JE; Martin AC; Salamov AA; Suwa M; Swindells MB; Thornton JM; Orengo CA
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2000 Feb; 28(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 10816141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and selectivity in protein similarity searches: a comparison of Smith-Waterman in hardware to BLAST and FASTA.
    Shpaer EG; Robinson M; Yee D; Candlin JD; Mines R; Hunkapiller T
    Genomics; 1996 Dec; 38(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 8954800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.
    Rost B
    Protein Eng; 1999 Feb; 12(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 10195279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequence database search using jumping alignments.
    Spang R; Rehmsmeier M; Stoye J
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 2000; 8():367-75. PubMed ID: 10977097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors.
    Rognes T; Seeberg E
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Aug; 16(8):699-706. PubMed ID: 11099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.