These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10196722)

  • 21. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
    Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Detection of simulated lung nodules evaluated with various film/screen systems].
    Li-Feng
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Feb; 57(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 9077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low-voltage digital selenium radiography: detection of simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters--a phantom study.
    Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Roehl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 15273341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. A simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease detection study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg AM
    Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 7558735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The use of an asymmetric film-screen combination for the imaging of round pulmonary foci].
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Gocke P; Gocke C; Blendl C; Turowski B; Buddenbrock B; John V
    Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 7579214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Lossy data compression of chest X-rays: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Kotter E; Roesner A; Torsten Winterer J; Ghanem N; Einert A; Jaeger D; Uhrmeister P; Langer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 12750612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
    Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detection of porcine bone lesions and fissures: comparing digital selenium, digital luminescence, and analog film-screen radiography.
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Wassmer G; Hellmich M; Winnekendonk G; Andermahr J; Gossmann A; Lackner KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1397-403. PubMed ID: 11717093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.