116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10196804)
1. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics.
Weinberg LA
Implant Dent; 1998; 7(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 10196804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I.
Weinberg LA
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):293-301. PubMed ID: 12498437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset.
Weinberg LA; Kruger B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):252-65. PubMed ID: 9084311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do angulated implants increase the amount of bone loss around implants in the anterior maxilla?
Tabrizi R; Pourdanesh F; Zare S; Daneste H; Zeini N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 23351760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of implant/prosthesis loading with four clinical variables.
Weinberg LA; Kruger B
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):421-33. PubMed ID: 8595100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):794-805. PubMed ID: 23458566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The all on 4 shelf: mandible.
Jensen OT; Adams MW; Cottam JR; Parel SM; Phillips WR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 21055862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant positioning when replacing the four maxillary incisors: a platform-switched treatment option.
Vela-Nebot X; Méndez-Blanco V; Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Segalá-Torres M; Gil-Lozano JA
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 21837303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months.
Pozzi A; Sannino G; Barlattani A
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Nov; 108(5):286-97. PubMed ID: 23107236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region.
Sato Y; Shindoi N; Hosokawa R; Tsuga K; Akagawa Y
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10632839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant insertional torque values predict outcomes.
Walker LR; Morris GA; Novotny PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1344-9. PubMed ID: 21398013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study.
Calvo-Guirado JL; Ortiz-Ruiz AJ; López-Marí L; Delgado-Ruiz R; Maté-Sánchez J; Bravo Gonzalez LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 19492643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading.
Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
