120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10196811)
1. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of implanted biomaterials: morphology of the implant-tissue interactions.
Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Young TR; Buttle K
Implant Dent; 1998; 7(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 10196811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biologic tissue responses to uncoated and coated implanted biomaterials.
Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Young TR; Sisk AL; Parr GR
Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():27-33. PubMed ID: 11276743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental studies of the implant-tissue interface.
Steflik DE; Sisk AL; Parr GA; Lake FT; Hanes PJ
J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(2):90-4; discussion 136-7. PubMed ID: 8246304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoblast activity at the dental implant-bone interface: transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations.
Steflik DE; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Lake FT; Hanes PJ; Berkery DJ; Brewer P
J Periodontol; 1994 May; 65(5):404-13. PubMed ID: 8046555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface: high-voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observations.
Steflik DE; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Gardner LK; Hanes PJ; Lake FT; Berkery DJ; Brewer P
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):791-800. PubMed ID: 8408109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlative transmission electron microscopic and scanning electron microscopic observations of the tissues supporting endosteal blade implants.
Steflik EE; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Lake FT; Brewer P; Horner J; McKinney RV
J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 1289548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrastructural analyses of the attachment (bonding) zone between bone and implanted biomaterials.
Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Young TR; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Berkery DJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Mar; 39(4):611-20. PubMed ID: 9492223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electron microscopy of bone response to titanium cylindrical screw-type endosseous dental implants.
Steflik DE; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ; Lake FT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 1299646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure of the bone-titanium interface in retrieved clinical oral implants.
Sennerby L; Ericson LE; Thomsen P; Lekholm U; Astrand P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 1843463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant--bone interface.
Steflik DE; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Davis HC; Adams BO; Yavari J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 8820118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices.
Letić-Gavrilović A; Scandurra R; Abe K
Dent Mater J; 2000 Jun; 19(2):99-132. PubMed ID: 11219100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs.
Buser D; Weber HP; Donath K; Fiorellini JP; Paquette DW; Williams RC
J Periodontol; 1992 Mar; 63(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 1593416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology of the bone that supports endosteal dental implants. Transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations.
Steflik DE; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ; Lake FT; Gardner LK; Berkery DJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 8233427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Light and transmission electron microscopy of the intact interfaces between non-submerged titanium-coated epoxy resin implants and bone or gingiva.
Listgarten MA; Buser D; Steinemann SG; Donath K; Lang NP; Weber HP
J Dent Res; 1992 Feb; 71(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 1556294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transmission electron microscopic and high voltage electron microscopic observations of the bone and osteocyte activity adjacent to unloaded dental implants placed in dogs.
Steflik DE; Hanes PJ; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Song MJ; Lake FT; McKinney RV
J Periodontol; 1992 May; 63(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1527688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A light and electron microscopic comparison of osseointegration of six implant types.
Sisk AL; Steflik DE; Parr GR; Hanes PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jul; 50(7):709-16; discussion 716-7. PubMed ID: 1608000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
