294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10196835)
1. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
Steele A; Johnson BR
J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.
Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
Trope M; Tronstad L
J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite.
Hürmüzlü F; Kiremitçi A; Serper A; Altundaşar E; Siso SH
J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):838-40. PubMed ID: 14686819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture strength of endodontically treated molars transfixed horizontally by a fiber glass post.
Beltrão MC; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Mota EG; Burnett LH
Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19281106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
