173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10196845)
1. Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty/wash impression technique.
Richards MW; Zeiaei S; Bagby MD; Okubo S; Soltani J
J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 7(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 10196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Martinez LJ; von Fraunhofer JA
J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy.
Brosky ME; Pesun IJ; Lowder PD; Delong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 11854678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique.
Sayed ME; Sayed ME; Al-Makramani BM; Al-Sanabani FA; Mohamed MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):734-739. PubMed ID: 27733716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of dimensional precision of different silicone impression materials.
Al-Zarea BK; Sughaireen MG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 22186818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
Tjan AH; Li T
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
