BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10197337)

  • 1. Composite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations.
    Eidelman E
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 10197337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sealed restorations: 5-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Richards EE; Williams JE; Smith CD; Mackert JR; Schuster GS; Sherrer JD; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Wenner KK
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 1524744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Barr-Agholme M; Odén A; Dahllöf G; Modeér T
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sealed restorations: 4-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Williams JE; Pierce KL; Smith CD; Schuster GS; Mackert JR; Sherrer JD; Wenner KK; Richards EE; Davis QB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 2003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assessment of amalgam restorations provided for primary school children].
    Lusananda S; Panya-ngarm R; Charoensupaya O
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1991; 41(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 1918568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 1299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Call-Smith KM; Shuster GS; Williams JE; Davis QB; Smith CD; Bell RA; Sherrer JD; Myers DR; Morse PK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Nov; 115(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 3479490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The preventive resin restoration: a conservative alternative.
    McConnachie I
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 1555123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mixed amalgam-composite restorations].
    Dallari A; Rovatti L
    Attual Dent; 1987 Apr; 3(14):10-1, 13-9. PubMed ID: 3477241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of posterior composite restorations on the resistance of cavity walls to vertically applied occlusal loads.
    Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Gontar G; Hirsh A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jan; 17(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 2299475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationale for designing cavity preparations.
    Laswell HR; Welk DA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 3888696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a restoration containing fluoride: two-year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Jinks GM
    Pediatr Dent; 1989 Dec; 11(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 2639322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The composite resin-amalgam window preparation.
    Nelson JA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 4(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 1391930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition in vitro of caries around amalgam restorations by bonding amalgam to tooth structure.
    Torii Y; Staninec M; Kawakami M; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    Oper Dent; 1989; 14(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2700384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staining of residual caries under freshly-packed amalgam restorations exposed to tea/chlorhexidine in vitro.
    Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Smith MM
    Int Dent J; 1990 Aug; 40(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 2397953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posterior composite resin: use for anterior restorations.
    Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 2373783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.