118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10197454)
1. Density predicts the activity-dependent failure load of proximal femora with defects.
Michaeli DA; Inoue K; Hayes WC; Hipp JA
Skeletal Radiol; 1999 Feb; 28(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 10197454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting failure load of the femur with simulated osteolytic defects using noninvasive imaging technique in a simplified load case.
Lee T
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 35(4):642-50. PubMed ID: 17286207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for predicting fracture loads of the infant femur for injury investigation: an in vitro porcine model.
Pierce MC; Valdevit A; Anderson L; Inoue N; Hauser DL
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 11149504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur.
Lochmüller EM; Miller P; Bürklein D; Wehr U; Rambeck W; Eckstein F
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 10928227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].
Bonnaire F; Weber A; Bösl O; Eckhardt C; Schwieger K; Linke B
Unfallchirurg; 2007 May; 110(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 17361444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone texture analysis of human femurs using a new device (BMA™) improves failure load prediction.
Kolta S; Paratte S; Amphoux T; Persohn S; Campana S; Skalli W; Paternotte S; Argenson JN; Bouler JM; Gagey O; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1311-6. PubMed ID: 21656265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DXA and pQCT predict pertrochanteric and not femoral neck fracture load in a human side-impact fracture model.
Gebauer M; Stark O; Vettorazzi E; Grifka J; Püschel K; Amling M; Beckmann J
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24019186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the strength of femoral shafts with and without metastatic lesions.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Rossi SA; Pejcic MR; Tehranzadeh J; Skinner HB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Oct; 439():161-70. PubMed ID: 16205155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting pathologic fracture risk in the management of metastatic bone defects.
Hipp JA; Springfield DS; Hayes WC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Mar; (312):120-35. PubMed ID: 7634597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.
Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; de Bakker PM; Liu D; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Oxland TR; McKay HA
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1539-45. PubMed ID: 16847586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel approach of predicting fracture load in the human proximal femur using non-invasive QCT imaging technique.
Lee T; Pereira BP; Chung YS; Oh HJ; Choi JB; Lim D; Shin JH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 37(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 19288197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro.
Bauer JS; Kohlmann S; Eckstein F; Mueller D; Lochmüller EM; Link TM
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Feb; 78(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16467973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.
Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; Cooper DM; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Forster BB; McKay HA
Osteoporos Int; 2009 Mar; 20(3):445-53. PubMed ID: 18661091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
