These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10198136)

  • 1. Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli. An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap.
    Wascher E; Reinhard M; Wauschkuhn B; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 11(2):214-29. PubMed ID: 10198136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shifting visual attention in space: an electrophysiological analysis using high spatial resolution mapping.
    Hopf JM; Mangun GR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 111(7):1241-57. PubMed ID: 10880800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On how the motor cortices resolve an inter-hemispheric response conflict: an event-related EEG potential-guided TMS study of the flankers task.
    Verleger R; Kuniecki M; Möller F; Fritzmannova M; Siebner HR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(2):318-26. PubMed ID: 19614982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are eyes special? Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for a dissociation between eye-gaze and arrows attentional mechanisms.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Román-Caballero R; Narganes-Pineda C; Martín-Arévalo E
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():146-152. PubMed ID: 30935837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale visuomotor integration in the cerebral cortex.
    Ledberg A; Bressler SL; Ding M; Coppola R; Nakamura R
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jan; 17(1):44-62. PubMed ID: 16452643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [EEG correlates of different methods of information processing in response selection].
    Wascher E; Wauschkuhn B; Verleger R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 9498925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study.
    Gunter TC; Wijers AA; Jackson JL; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Mar; 31(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 8153250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):577-601. PubMed ID: 16104096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context modulates early stimulus processing when resolving stimulus-response conflict.
    Scerif G; Worden MS; Davidson M; Seiger L; Casey BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):781-92. PubMed ID: 16768377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Umiltà C; Eimer M
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 17602216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with FMRI signals in human visual cortex.
    Whittingstall K; Wilson D; Schmidt M; Stroink G
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18841455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays.
    Lange JJ; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Mulder G
    Biol Psychol; 1999 Jul; 50(3):203-33. PubMed ID: 10461806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional overlap between arrows as cueing stimuli and responses?. Evidence from contra-ipsilateral differences in EEG potentials.
    Verleger R; Vollmer C; Wauschkuhn B; van der Lubbe RH; Wascher E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2000 Sep; 10(1-2):99-109. PubMed ID: 10978697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarities and differences between interference from stimulus position and from direction of an arrow: behavioral and event-related potential measures.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 23856354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: a high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Praamstra P; Oostenveld R
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 May; 16(3):309-22. PubMed ID: 12706212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.