These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10198930)
1. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system. Abulafia O; Sherer DM Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy. Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy. O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review. Mitchell H; Medley G Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality control of cervical cytology in high-risk women. PAPNET system compared with manual rescreening. Bergeron C; Masseroli M; Ghezi A; Lemarie A; Mango L; Koss LG Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 10740599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece. Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory]. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears. Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of PAPNET system for rescreening of negative cervical smears. Ashfaq R; Liang Y; Saboorian MH Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7587873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience. Brotzman GL; Kretzchmar S; Ferguson D; Gottlieb M; Stowe C Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System. Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System. Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer]. Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Koss LG; Lin E; Schreiber K; Elgert P; Mango L Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the AutoPap 300 QC System. Abulafia O; Sherer DM Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Jul; 54(7):469-76. PubMed ID: 10394585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Papnet-assisted and manual screening of cervical smears. Losell K; Dejmek A Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 10495327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective study of PAPNET: review of 25,656 Pap smears negative on manual screening and rapid rescreening. Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10588350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears]. Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system. Mitchell H; Medley G Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]