187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10199078)
1. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens].
Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG
Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.
Kaiser J
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US broadens scientific base of controls on carcinogens.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6576):659. PubMed ID: 8614448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinogenic effects of benzene--a status update and research needs to improve risk assessments: US EPA perspective. Environmental Protection Agency.
Sonawane B; Bayliss D; Valcovic L; Chen C; Rodan B; Farland W
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Nov; 61(5-6):471-2. PubMed ID: 11086954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A toxicologist's view of cancer risk assessment.
Rozman KK; Kerecsen L; Viluksela MK; Osterle D; Deml E; Viluksela M; Stahl BU; Greim H; Doull J
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):29-52. PubMed ID: 8744588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public health. Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards.
Smith AH; Lopipero PA; Bates MN; Steinmaus CM
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2145-6. PubMed ID: 12077388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer risk assessment: evolution of the process.
Farland WH
Prev Med; 1996; 25(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 8778755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending the threshold of regulation concept: de minimis limits for carcinogens and mutagens.
Fiori JM; Meyerhoff RD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):209-16. PubMed ID: 12052005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reality versus extrapolation: an academic perspective of cancer risk regulation.
Waddell WJ
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):181-95. PubMed ID: 8744595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [A regulatory view on the article: Risk evaluation of carcinogens and their threshold levels, part I-III].
Dieter HH; Konietzka R
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Sep; 49(9):921-5. PubMed ID: 16953360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential new approaches for children's inhalation risk assessment.
Firestone M; Sonawane B; Barone S; Salmon AG; Brown JP; Hattis D; Woodruff T
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 18097946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of in vivo mutation data can inform cancer risk assessment.
Moore MM; Heflich RH; Haber LT; Allen BC; Shipp AM; Kodell RL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 18321622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [What is the understanding of the scientific basis and the regulatory toxicology associated with the term "not appreciable " in the risk evaluation of carcinogens].
Dieter HH; Konietzka R; Neumann HG
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1084-5. PubMed ID: 17676413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Correct equations for calculating the maximum allowable fish consumption rate for human health risk assessment considering the noncarcinogenic effects of multiple contaminants in fish.
Yu Y; Zhang D; Zhang X
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10481-2. PubMed ID: 22989162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is ionizing radiation regulated more stringently than chemical carcinogens?
Travis CC; Pack SR; Hattemer-Frey HA
Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 2925392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants.
Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple method for quantitative risk assessment of non-threshold carcinogens based on the dose descriptor T25.
Sanner T; Dybing E; Willems MI; Kroese ED
Pharmacol Toxicol; 2001 Jun; 88(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 11453374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The uses and misuses of skepticism: epidemiology and its critics.
Ozonoff D
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9672569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. EPA considering raising chloroform goals for drinking water.
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):290. PubMed ID: 9672557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculation of cancer risk.
Walker B
Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Jan; 105(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 9074866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
