BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201081)

  • 1. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience.
    Timmerman D; Schwärzler P; Collins WP; Claerhout F; Coenen M; Amant F; Vergote I; Bourne TH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10201081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of assessment of Doppler ultrasound findings in adnexal masses.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 42(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 23065868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
    Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confidence of expert ultrasound operators in making a diagnosis of adnexal tumor: effect on diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement.
    Yazbek J; Ameye L; Testa AC; Valentin L; Timmerman D; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 19757401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
    Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S; White LM; Lai J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of ultrasonography performed by examiners with varied training and experience in predicting specific pathology of adnexal masses.
    Sayasneh A; Kaijser J; Preisler J; Smith AA; Raslan F; Johnson S; Husicka R; Ferrara L; Stalder C; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 25270506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular network assessment of adnexal masses: intraobserver and interobserver agreement analysis.
    Alcázar JL; Cabrera C; Galván R; Guerriero S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):997-1001. PubMed ID: 18577662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the reproducibility of the IOTA simple ultrasound rules for classifying adnexal masses as benign or malignant using stored 3D volumes.
    Guerriero S; Saba L; Ajossa S; Peddes C; Sedda F; Piras A; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Alcázar JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 24060210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of adnexal masses: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of videos, using IOTA terminology.
    Massobrio R; Mariani LL; Conti D; De Grandis T; Buonomo F; Badellino E; Novara L; Bounous VE; Perotto S; Mancarella M; Ferrero A; Biglia N; Fuso L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 309(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 37789207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
    Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.