These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201104)

  • 1. An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.
    Harding JW; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Asmus J; Mlela K; Muller J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 10201104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.
    Peck SM; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Brown KA; Richman D; McComas JJ; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):263-90. PubMed ID: 8810061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement.
    Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Vorndran CM; Kuhn SA; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.
    Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Maglieri KA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 15898474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional communication training with and without alternative reinforcement and punishment: an analysis of 58 applications.
    Rooker GW; Jessel J; Kurtz PF; Hagopian LP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013 Dec; 46(4):708-22. PubMed ID: 24114463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
    Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caregiver preference for reinforcement-based interventions for problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
    Gabor AM; Fritz JN; Roath CT; Rothe BR; Gourley DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 26792408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the interaction between quality of attention and negative reinforcement with children who display escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Gardner AW; Wacker DP; Boelter EW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 19949522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between rate of negative reinforcement and the persistence of task completion.
    Romani PW; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Lustig NH; Vinquist KM; Northup J; Kane AM; Carrion DP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 26412807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A brief computer-based assessment of reinforcer dimensions affecting choice.
    Neef NA; Lutz MN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 11317987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective?
    Clark DR; Donaldson JM; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Dec; 48(4):895-900. PubMed ID: 26333156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
    Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of rules on differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Watts AC; Wilder DA; Gregory MK; Leon Y; Ditzian K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 24114232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Lomas Mevers JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Fredrick LD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):277-92. PubMed ID: 24764205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies.
    Richman DM; Wacker DP; Asmus JM; Casey SD; Andelman M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):269-83. PubMed ID: 10513024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief hierarchical assessment of potential treatment components with children in an outpatient clinic.
    Harding J; Wacker DP; Cooper LJ; Millard T; Jensen-Kovalan P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 8063627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of choice as a reinforcer for typically developing children.
    Ackerlund Brandt JA; Dozier CL; Juanico JF; Laudont CL; Mick BR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):344-62. PubMed ID: 25916749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.