These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201108)

  • 21. The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.
    Steinhilber J; Johnson C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(4):767-72. PubMed ID: 18189114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stability of daily preference across multiple individuals.
    Kelley ME; Shillingsburg MA; Bowen CN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 26816192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of motivating operations and discriminative stimuli on challenging behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
    Edrisinha C; O'Reilly M; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Choi HY
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):836-45. PubMed ID: 21095097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.
    Bordner KA; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Apr; 32(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 18366451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the relation between reinforcer efficacy and preference.
    Lee MS; Yu CT; Martin TL; Martin GL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 20808498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
    Carr JE; Nicolson AC; Higbee TS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 11051581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using a Time Timer to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities.
    Grey I; Healy O; Leader G; Hayes D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 18926663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of multiple alcohol deprivations on operant ethanol self-administration by high-alcohol-drinking replicate rat lines.
    Oster SM; Toalston JE; Kuc KA; Pommer TJ; Murphy JM; Lumeng L; Bell RL; McBride WJ; Rodd ZA
    Alcohol; 2006 Apr; 38(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 16905441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
    Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.
    Kelly MA; Roscoe EM; Hanley GP; Schlichenmeyer K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 24604393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stimulus specificity and dishabituation of operant responding in humans.
    Kenzer AL; Ghezzi PM; Fuller T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 23633179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using progressive ratio schedules to evaluate tokens as generalized conditioned reinforcers.
    Russell D; Ingvarsson ET; Haggar JL; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 29193060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.
    Klatt KP; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11214025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.