These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201756)
1. Peer review: studying the major otolaryngology journals. Bhattacharyya N Laryngoscope; 1999 Apr; 109(4):640-4. PubMed ID: 10201756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical research publication in a selection of research and surgical specialty journals. Donovan AJ; Tompkins RK Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 19767050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck Surgery journals. Fenton JE; Roy D; Hughes JP; Jones AS J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Jul; 116(7):494-8. PubMed ID: 12238666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurable progress in female authorship in otolaryngology. Bergeron JL; Wilken R; Miller ME; Shapiro NL; Bhattacharyya N Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 22328701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subspecialization of the ophthalmic literature: a review of the publishing trends of the top general, clinical ophthalmic journals. Kumar A; Cheeseman R; Durnian JM Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1211-4. PubMed ID: 21269704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Levels of evidence in otolaryngology journals. Wasserman JM; Wynn R; Bash TS; Rosenfeld RM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 May; 134(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 16647522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in the American interventional radiology literature: comparison over a 10-year time period. Ray CE; Gupta R; Blackwell J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 16565796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery. Reed DA; Beckman TJ; Wright SM Am J Surg; 2009 Sep; 198(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 19716888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical methods in the surgical literature. Kurichi JE; Sonnad SS J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Mar; 202(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 16500253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11. Kelen G; Sauer LM Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19202890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative studies of thr bibliographic impact of European and American ENT reviews]. Robillard T; Gelin P Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1990; 44(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 2093290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased female authorship in otolaryngology over the past three decades. Bhattacharyya N; Shapiro NL Laryngoscope; 2000 Mar; 110(3 Pt 1):358-61. PubMed ID: 10718419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tackling the case report. Fenton JE; Khoo SG; Ahmed I; Ullah I; Shaikh M Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Sep; 31(3):205-7; discussion 207. PubMed ID: 15364351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Luty J; Arokiadass SM; Easow JM; Anapreddy JR J Med Ethics; 2009 Mar; 35(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 19251974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do abstracts in otolaryngology journals report study findings accurately? McCoul ED; Vengerovich G; Burstein DH; Rosenfeld RM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 142(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 20115979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. Feramisco JD; Leitenberger JJ; Redfern SI; Bian A; Xie XJ; Resneck JS J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Jan; 60(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19103359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow? Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why should surgeons care about clinical research methodology? Chang DC; Matsen SL; Simpkins CE J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):827-30. PubMed ID: 17116550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]