419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201756)
1. Peer review: studying the major otolaryngology journals.
Bhattacharyya N
Laryngoscope; 1999 Apr; 109(4):640-4. PubMed ID: 10201756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical research publication in a selection of research and surgical specialty journals.
Donovan AJ; Tompkins RK
Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 19767050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck Surgery journals.
Fenton JE; Roy D; Hughes JP; Jones AS
J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Jul; 116(7):494-8. PubMed ID: 12238666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurable progress in female authorship in otolaryngology.
Bergeron JL; Wilken R; Miller ME; Shapiro NL; Bhattacharyya N
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jul; 147(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 22328701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subspecialization of the ophthalmic literature: a review of the publishing trends of the top general, clinical ophthalmic journals.
Kumar A; Cheeseman R; Durnian JM
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1211-4. PubMed ID: 21269704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Levels of evidence in otolaryngology journals.
Wasserman JM; Wynn R; Bash TS; Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 May; 134(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 16647522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in the American interventional radiology literature: comparison over a 10-year time period.
Ray CE; Gupta R; Blackwell J
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 16565796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery.
Reed DA; Beckman TJ; Wright SM
Am J Surg; 2009 Sep; 198(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 19716888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical methods in the surgical literature.
Kurichi JE; Sonnad SS
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Mar; 202(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 16500253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11.
Kelen G; Sauer LM
Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19202890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative studies of thr bibliographic impact of European and American ENT reviews].
Robillard T; Gelin P
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1990; 44(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 2093290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased female authorship in otolaryngology over the past three decades.
Bhattacharyya N; Shapiro NL
Laryngoscope; 2000 Mar; 110(3 Pt 1):358-61. PubMed ID: 10718419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tackling the case report.
Fenton JE; Khoo SG; Ahmed I; Ullah I; Shaikh M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Sep; 31(3):205-7; discussion 207. PubMed ID: 15364351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.
Luty J; Arokiadass SM; Easow JM; Anapreddy JR
J Med Ethics; 2009 Mar; 35(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 19251974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do abstracts in otolaryngology journals report study findings accurately?
McCoul ED; Vengerovich G; Burstein DH; Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 142(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 20115979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades.
Feramisco JD; Leitenberger JJ; Redfern SI; Bian A; Xie XJ; Resneck JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Jan; 60(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19103359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why should surgeons care about clinical research methodology?
Chang DC; Matsen SL; Simpkins CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):827-30. PubMed ID: 17116550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
