135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201861)
1. The value of specialist oncological radiology review of cross-sectional imaging.
Loughrey GJ; Carrington BM; Anderson H; Dobson MJ; Lo Ying Ping F
Clin Radiol; 1999 Mar; 54(3):149-54; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 10201861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological radiology.
Spencer JA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jul; 56(7):521-2. PubMed ID: 11446748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT.
McCreadie G; Oliver TB
Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):491-9; discussion 500-1. PubMed ID: 19348844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating a radiologist in a radiation oncology department: a new model of care?
Dimigen M; Vinod SK; Lim K
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Oct; 26(10):630-5. PubMed ID: 24880572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between oncologists and peripheral hospital radiologists in the North-West of England.
Bungay PM; Carrington BM; Corgié D; Eardley A
Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 12014877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double reading of current chest CT examinations: Clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.
Lauritzen PM; Stavem K; Andersen JG; Stokke MV; Tennstrand AL; Bjerke G; Hurlen P; Sandbæk G; Dahl FA; Gulbrandsen P
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 26724666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, part I].
Krug B; Böttge M; Coburger S; Reineke T; Zähringer M; V Smekal U; Winnekendonk G; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12525980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introduction of QUIP (quality information program) as a semi-automated quality assessment endeavor allowing retrospective review of errors in cross-sectional abdominal imaging.
Kielar AZ; McInnes M; Quan M; O'Sullivan J
Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1358-64. PubMed ID: 21855370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comprehensive cancer centers in Germany: role of radiology].
Kauczor HU
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15719291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center.
Stevens KJ; Griffiths KL; Rosenberg J; Mahadevan S; Zatz LM; Leung AN
Acad Radiol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):1217-26. PubMed ID: 18790392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies.
Lindgren EA; Patel MD; Wu Q; Melikian J; Hara AK
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24748211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. JOURNAL CLUB: Hepatopancreaticobiliary Imaging Second-Opinion Consultations: Is There Value in the Second Reading?
Shetty AS; Mittal A; Salter A; Narra VR; Fowler KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1264-1272. PubMed ID: 30247982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrepancy in reporting among specialist registrars and the role of a paediatric neuroradiologist in reporting paediatric CT head examinations.
Nagaraja S; Ullah Q; Lee KJ; Bickle I; Hon LQ; Griffiths PD; Raghavan A; Flynn P; Connolly DJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Sep; 64(9):891-6. PubMed ID: 19664479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results from the first year as a major trauma radiology unit in the UK.
Adiotomre A; Chopra A; Kirwadi A; Kotnis N
Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):812-21. PubMed ID: 24837700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Added value of abdominal cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) in staging of Wilms' tumours.
McDonald K; Duffy P; Chowdhury T; McHugh K
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 22892244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The development of quality assurance programs for radiotherapy within the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Introduction, continuing work, and results of the radiotherapy reference panel.
Müller RP; Eich HT
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Sep; 181(9):557-66. PubMed ID: 16170482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
