BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10201861)

  • 21. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
    Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value of Specialist Pathology Review in a Single Statewide Gynecologic Cancer Service.
    Melon J; Leung Y; Salfinger SG; Tan J; Mohan G; Cohen PA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jan; 27(1):171-176. PubMed ID: 28002209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period.
    Herzog R; Elgort DR; Flanders AE; Moley PJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):554-561. PubMed ID: 27867079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality and Value of Subspecialty Reinterpretation of Thoracic CT Scans of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cancer Center.
    Carter BW; Erasmus JJ; Truong MT; Shepard JO; Hofstetter W; Clarke R; Munden RF; Steele JR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1109-1118. PubMed ID: 28434844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comprehensive Oncologic Imaging in Infants and Preschool Children With Substantially Reduced Radiation Exposure Using Combined Simultaneous ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Direct Comparison to ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.
    Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Gücke B; Bezrukov I; Seitz G; Ebinger M; Reimold M; Pfannenberg CA; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schäfer JF
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 26309185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An audit of management of differentiated thyroid cancer in specialist and non-specialist clinic settings.
    Kumar H; Daykin J; Holder R; Watkinson JC; Sheppard MC; Franklyn JA
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2001 Jun; 54(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 11422105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical imaging.
    Kreel L
    Postgrad Med J; 1991 Apr; 67(786):334-46. PubMed ID: 2068025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The status of domestic PET/CT attendance in the light of the waiting list data].
    Galuska L; Balkay L
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Jun; 54(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 20576593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. PET/CT: will it change the way that we use CT in cancer imaging?
    Hicks RJ; Ware RE; Lau EW
    Cancer Imaging; 2006 Oct; 6(Spec No A):S52-62. PubMed ID: 17114079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimising the impact of errors in the interpretation of CT images for surveillance and evaluation of therapy in cancer.
    Morgan B; Stephenson JA; Griffin Y
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1083-94. PubMed ID: 27522436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A five-year audit of anal cancer in Wales.
    Karandikar SS; Borley A; Crosby T; Williams G; Reynolds S; Radcliffe AG
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 May; 8(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 16630228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiological evaluation of the therapeutic response of malignant diseases: status quo, innovative developments and requirements for radiology.
    Höink AJ; Heindel W; Buerke B
    Rofo; 2014 Oct; 186(10):927-36. PubMed ID: 25122173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How accurate is cancer scan reporting?
    FitzGerald R; Mehra R
    Hosp Med; 2000 Sep; 61(9):637-42. PubMed ID: 11048605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter?
    Hillier JC; Tattersall DJ; Gleeson FV
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Feb; 59(2):159-62; discussion 157-8. PubMed ID: 14746785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of response following treatment for malignant disease.
    MacVicar D; Husband JE
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70 Spec No():S41-9. PubMed ID: 9534717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films.
    Wakeley CJ; Jones AM; Kabala JE; Prince D; Goddard PR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Apr; 68(808):358-60. PubMed ID: 7795970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The radiological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia in everyday practice: an audit of reports, review of diagnostic criteria, and proposal for service improvement.
    Dewer B; Rogers P; Ricketts J; Mukonoweshuro W; Zeman A
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 26652610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.
    Mortensen MB
    Dan Med J; 2012 Dec; 59(12):B4568. PubMed ID: 23290296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
    Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Clinical Impact of Resident-attending Discrepancies in On-call Radiology Reporting: A Retrospective Assessment.
    McWilliams SR; Smith C; Oweis Y; Mawad K; Raptis C; Mellnick V
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):727-732. PubMed ID: 29337090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.