These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10202062)

  • 1. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
    Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of wire integrity and ability to reprocess single-use sphincterotomes.
    Kozarek RA; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Merriam LD; Irizarry DC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 9040994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jan; 49(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9869721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How many times can you reuse a "single-use" sphincterotome? A prospective evaluation.
    Wilcox CM; Geels W; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Jul; 48(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 9684666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability, cost-effectiveness, and safety of reuse of ancillary devices for ERCP.
    Prat F; Spieler JF; Paci S; Pallier C; Fritsch J; Choury AD; Pelletier G; Raspaud S; Nordmann P; Buffet C
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Aug; 60(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 15278053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective multicenter study comparing a standard reusable sphincterotome with a disposable triple-lumen sphincterotome.
    Canard JM; Cellier C; Houcke P; Laurent J; Gorce D; Landi B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jun; 51(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 10840304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost analysis.
    Cohen J; Haber GB; Kortan P; Dorais JA; Scheider DM; Cirocco M; Habib J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9040995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistent improvement in sphincterotome orientation with manual grooming.
    Seibert DG; Matulis SR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Oct; 42(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 8536901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
    Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.
    Ogoshi K
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G82-5. PubMed ID: 11100999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of integrity and sterilization of single-use argon beam plasma coagulation probes.
    Roach SK; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Sumida SE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. If it is reusable, why not reuse it?
    Belkin NL
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):357-8. PubMed ID: 12138970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
    Fireman Z
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Costs of Reusable Versus Disposable Equipment for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures Using Activity-Based Costing Analysis.
    Voigt J; Seigerman D; Lutsky K; Beredjiklian P; Leinberry C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):339.e1-339.e15. PubMed ID: 33191039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.