215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10202062)
1. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Lee RM; Vida F; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ; Gluck M; Tomas A; Sumida SE; Irizarry D; Jane C
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Apr; 49(4 Pt 1):477-82. PubMed ID: 10202062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of wire integrity and ability to reprocess single-use sphincterotomes.
Kozarek RA; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Merriam LD; Irizarry DC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 9040994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Ball TJ; Patterson DJ; Brandabur JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jan; 49(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9869721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How many times can you reuse a "single-use" sphincterotome? A prospective evaluation.
Wilcox CM; Geels W; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Jul; 48(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 9684666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability, cost-effectiveness, and safety of reuse of ancillary devices for ERCP.
Prat F; Spieler JF; Paci S; Pallier C; Fritsch J; Choury AD; Pelletier G; Raspaud S; Nordmann P; Buffet C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Aug; 60(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 15278053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective multicenter study comparing a standard reusable sphincterotome with a disposable triple-lumen sphincterotome.
Canard JM; Cellier C; Houcke P; Laurent J; Gorce D; Landi B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Jun; 51(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 10840304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost analysis.
Cohen J; Haber GB; Kortan P; Dorais JA; Scheider DM; Cirocco M; Habib J
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Feb; 45(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9040995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistent improvement in sphincterotome orientation with manual grooming.
Seibert DG; Matulis SR
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Oct; 42(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 8536901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.
Ogoshi K
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G82-5. PubMed ID: 11100999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of integrity and sterilization of single-use argon beam plasma coagulation probes.
Roach SK; Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Sumida SE
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Jan; 94(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9934744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. If it is reusable, why not reuse it?
Belkin NL
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):357-8. PubMed ID: 12138970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
Fireman Z
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Costs of Reusable Versus Disposable Equipment for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Procedures Using Activity-Based Costing Analysis.
Voigt J; Seigerman D; Lutsky K; Beredjiklian P; Leinberry C
J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):339.e1-339.e15. PubMed ID: 33191039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
