These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10202471)

  • 1. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.
    Arnold BA; Scheibe PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
    Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.
    Martins MG; Haiter Neto F; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.