119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10202667)
1. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up.
Ioffe OB; Brooks SE; De Rezende RB; Silverberg SG
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 10202667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can a more detailed evaluation of excision margins refine cytologic follow-up of women post-LLETZ for high-grade dysplasia?
Treacy A; Devaney D; Mulligan NJ; Boyd W; O'Keane JC
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 Sep; 29(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 20736775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) without histological proof of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion: Results of a two-year continuous retrospective study.
Pecourt M; Gondry J; Foulon A; Lanta-Delmas S; Sergent F; Chevreau J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 49(6):101621. PubMed ID: 31430562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The immediate postconization endocervical smear: evaluation of its utility in the detection of residual dysplasia.
Frauchiger WL; De Frias DV; Cajulis RS; Yu GH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1139-43. PubMed ID: 9755671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The pre- and postoperative value of endocervical curettage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.
Fine BA; Feinstein GI; Sabella V
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 9784317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinicopathologic variables predictive of residual dysplasia after cervical conization.
Schermerhorn TJ; Hodge J; Saltzman AK; Hackett TE; Sprance HE; Harrison TA
J Reprod Med; 1997 Apr; 42(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 9131490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins.
Montz FJ; Holschneider CH; Thompson LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):976-82. PubMed ID: 8497366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-conization endocervical curettage for estimating the risk of persistent or recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Meirovitz M; Eger G; Benharroch D; Dreiher J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23332656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization.
Naumann RW; Bell MC; Alvarez RD; Edwards RP; Partridge EE; Helm CW; Shingleton HM; McGee JA; Higgins RV; Hall JB
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 7959288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histopathological variables predicting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions after large-loop excision of the transformation zone.
Barnes MN; Robertson MW; Naumann RW; Roland PY; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Partridge EE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Apr; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 25951467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further study of the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Kennedy AW; Biscotti CV
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 86(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 12217762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
Bretelle F; Cravello L; Yang L; Benmoura D; Roger V; Blanc B
Ann Chir; 2000 Jun; 125(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 10925486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The case for cytologic follow-up after LEEP.
Hanau CA; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 9167693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
