These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. Ogloff JR; Otto RK Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On paying money to research subjects: 'due' and 'undue' inducements. Macklin R IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abusing the bodies and minds of prisoners: how they are turned into guinea pigs without their knowledge. Benfell C Barrister; 1977; 4(2):22-25+. PubMed ID: 11664775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contractual aspects of human medical experimentation. Dickens BM Univ Tor Law J; 1975; 25(4):406-38. PubMed ID: 11664537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commentary on "Family dynamics and children in medical research. Robinson W J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 11644884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can we ensure that all research subjects give valid consent? Wendler D Arch Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 164(20):2201-4. PubMed ID: 15534155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A confederate's perspective on deception. Oliansky A Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11651141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent: I. The institutional non-liability clause as a liability in recruiting research subjects. Trice AD; Ogden EP J Soc Behav Pers; 1986; 1(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11659090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Money for research participation: does in jeopardize informed consent? Grady C Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 11951886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coparticipant effects on subjects' decisions to consent for risk-involving research. Finney PD J Soc Psychol; 1984 Oct; 124(First half):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The informed consent dilemma: an empirical approach. Michaels TF; Oetting ER J Soc Psychol; 1979 Dec; 109(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 11665208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent. Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extra credit for research subjects. Cohen JM IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable? Wendler D Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volunteers or pressed men: human subjects in science. Patrick JM Ergonomics; 1983 Jul; 26(7):637-8. PubMed ID: 6617631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of disease severity on the informed consent process in clinical research. Schaeffer MH; Krantz DS; Wichman A; Masur H; Reed E; Vinicky JK Am J Med; 1996 Mar; 100(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 8629670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai. Jianping W; Li L; Xue D; Tang Z; Jia X; Wu R; Xi Y; Wang T; Zhou P J Med Ethics; 2010 Jul; 36(7):415-9. PubMed ID: 20605996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal and ethical aspects of deliberate G-induced loss of consciousness experiments. Euretig JG Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Jul; 62(7):628-31. PubMed ID: 1898297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]