BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10203656)

  • 1. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings.
    Manetta A; Keefe K; Lin F; Ahdoot D; Kaleb V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 10203656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Geier CS; Wilson M; Creasman W
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 11174481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: is age important?
    Koonings PP; Price JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1457-9; discussion 1459-61. PubMed ID: 11408868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical significance of the qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: An analysis on the basis of histologic diagnoses.
    Vlahos NP; Dragisic KG; Wallach EE; Burroughs FH; Fluck S; Rosenthal DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 182(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 10764467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cytohistologic study of atypical glandular cells detected in cervical smears during cervical screening tests in Iran.
    Mood NI; Eftekhar Z; Haratian A; Saeedi L; Rahimi-Moghaddam P; Yarandi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):257-61. PubMed ID: 16445641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Histologic findings and proposed management.
    Hammoud MM; Haefner HK; Michael CW; Ansbacher R
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Apr; 47(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 12012877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in cervical Papanicolaou smears.
    Lojindarat S; Luengmettakul J; Puangsa-Art S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):975-82. PubMed ID: 23061299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
    Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytologic and histologic correlation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Ha SY; Cho HI; Oh YH; Lee JM; Suh KS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2001 Apr; 16(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 11306750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of high-grade cervical dysplasia and gynaecological malignancies following the cytologic diagnosis of atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance: a retrospective study of a state-wide screening population in Western Australia.
    Munro A; Williams V; Semmens J; Leung Y; Stewart CJ; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Steel N; Cohen P; O'leary P
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 26044565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification.
    Tam KF; Cheung AN; Liu KL; Ng TY; Pun TC; Chan YM; Wong LC; Ng AW; Ngan HY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 14675684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
    Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
    Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears.
    Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 10926811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of 10,296 pediatric and adolescent Papanicolaou smear diagnoses in northern New England.
    Mount SL; Papillo JL
    Pediatrics; 1999 Mar; 103(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 10049953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
    Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
    Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.