201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10204102)
1. Distribution of calponin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast.
Dabbs DJ; Gown AM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Apr; 20(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 10204102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunostaining patterns of myoepithelial cells in breast lesions: a comparison of CD10 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain.
Kalof AN; Tam D; Beatty B; Cooper K
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jun; 57(6):625-9. PubMed ID: 15166269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunohistochemical distinction of invasive from noninvasive breast lesions: a comparative study of p63 versus calponin and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain.
Werling RW; Hwang H; Yaziji H; Gown AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2003 Jan; 27(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 12502930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a novel marker, calponin, for myoepithelial cells in fine-needle aspirates of papillary breast lesions.
Mosunjac MB; Lewis MM; Lawson D; Cohen C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 10945900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phenotypic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ-associated myoepithelial cells: biologic and diagnostic implications.
Hilson JB; Schnitt SJ; Collins LC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 18936688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distribution of p63, a novel myoepithelial marker, in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the breast: an analysis of 82 samples.
Reis-Filho JS; Milanezi F; Amendoeira I; Albergaria A; Schmitt FC
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 12811858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracystic papillary carcinomas of the breast: a reevaluation using a panel of myoepithelial cell markers.
Collins LC; Carlo VP; Hwang H; Barry TS; Gown AM; Schnitt SJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1002-7. PubMed ID: 16861972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. D2-40: an additional marker for myoepithelial cells of breast and the precaution in interpreting tumor lymphovascular invasion.
Ren S; Abuel-Haija M; Khurana JS; Zhang X
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2011 Jan; 4(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 21326813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. p63 Staining of myoepithelial cells in breast fine needle aspirates: a study of its role in differentiating in situ from invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast.
Reis-Filho JS; Milanezi F; Amendoeira I; Albergaria A; Schmitt FC
J Clin Pathol; 2002 Dec; 55(12):936-9. PubMed ID: 12461063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myoepithelial cell staining patterns of papillary breast lesions: from intraductal papillomas to invasive papillary carcinomas.
Hill CB; Yeh IT
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jan; 123(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15762278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammary lesions diagnosed as "papillary" by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up.
Simsir A; Waisman J; Thorner K; Cangiarella J
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):156-65. PubMed ID: 12811856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of ductal hyperplasia with and without atypia and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sneige N; Staerkel GA
Hum Pathol; 1994 May; 25(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 8200642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are epithelial cells in fat or connective tissue a reliable indicator of tumor invasion in fine-needle aspiration of the breast?
Maygarden SJ; Brock MS; Novotny DB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Feb; 16(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 9067105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myoepithelial cells in lobular carcinoma in situ: distribution and immunophenotype.
Wang Y; Jindal S; Martel M; Wu Y; Schedin P; Troxell M
Hum Pathol; 2016 Sep; 55():126-34. PubMed ID: 27195907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical staining of papillary breast lesions.
Troxell ML; Masek M; Sibley RK
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Jun; 15(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 17525625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparative Study of Immunohistochemical Myoepithelial Cell Markers in Cutaneous Benign Cystic Apocrine Lesions.
Wood A; Houghton SL; Biswas A
Am J Dermatopathol; 2016 Jul; 38(7):475-83. PubMed ID: 26630681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of ductal lesions of breast].
Di F; Wong NL
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 39(7):467-72. PubMed ID: 21055176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Myoepithelial cells and basal lamina in poorly differentiated in situ duct carcinoma of the breast. An immunocytochemical study.
Damiani S; Ludvikova M; Tomasic G; Bianchi S; Gown AM; Eusebi V
Virchows Arch; 1999 Mar; 434(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 10190302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunocytochemical identification of cell types in benign and malignant breast diseases: variations in cell markers accompany the malignant state.
Rudland PS; Leinster SJ; Winstanley J; Green B; Atkinson M; Zakhour HD
J Histochem Cytochem; 1993 Apr; 41(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 8450194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ThinPrep vs. conventional smear cytologic preparations in analyzing fine-needle aspiration specimens from palpable breast masses.
Biscotti CV; Shorie JH; Gramlich TL; Easley KA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10425053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
