These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10205990)

  • 1. Learning effect in automatic static perimetry with Dicon TKS 4000 computed perimeter.
    Konareva-Kostianeva M; Atanassov M
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(3B Suppl 3):34-7. PubMed ID: 10205990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for quantitative assessment of visual field changes in primary open-angle glaucoma with a computerized perimeter DICON TKS 4000.
    Atanassov M; Konareva-Kostianeva M
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(2):46-51. PubMed ID: 9707812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 98(9):1560-3. PubMed ID: 7425915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma.
    Matsuo H; Tomita G; Suzuki Y; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 12483088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
    Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of stage of glaucoma, age and examination time on reliability parameters in computed perimetry with Dicon TKS 4000.
    Konareva-Kostianeva M; Atanassov M
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 10658349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized visual field screening in the management of patients with ocular hypertension.
    Dyster-Aas K; Heijl A; Lundgvist L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Dec; 58(6):918-928. PubMed ID: 7331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
    Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.